Search results

Name calling, how childish.

It's a rock, it didn't witness anything. Inanimate objects can't hear, can't see, can't talk. Calling that rock a witness and setting it up to be revered as something holy or sacred is idolatry.

I'm glad you found something you can pin your hopes to. If you want to learn about the God that holds my belief, you can find Him in the bible.

I love it when a plan comes together...

You believe in A god. Just not the One from the bible.

But it is. The reason you don't see that is because you don't believe in God.

1 John 3 5 And you know that He was manifested to take away our sins, and in Him there is no sin. Only one individual was born of God. Jesus. All other references to being born of God is making reference to being born again. No one is without sin. .

He said it was a monument, you said it was pagan. Monument.....Pagan... Pagan Monument. .

Are you sure?

I understand what you're saying, but that's not what the bible says.

You believe Paul is a false prophet? The New Testament didn't exist but the scriptures did. The scriptures that are being twisted in 2 Peter 3:16 are Paul's. Notice what it says. Paul's teaching's are hard to understand and people who lack understanding twist his teaching's to their own...

I thought it was a lump of stone. And if it's not a pagan idol, it's a pagan something because the pagans built it. A pagan monument dedicated to Christians... .

What did pagans usually do with their stone monuments?

A pillar of stone that is pagan in nature. Why was this "lump of stone" revered instead of destroyed. What made this stone special?

When you say stuff like that, it tells me you're not being honest. Anyone who knows what an obelisk looks like will tell you that "lump of stone" is an obelisk. It was built for the worship of Egyptian gods. Calling it anything other than what it is, is being dishonest. How about your quote...

Ra aside, it's still an Egyptian idol. A pagan idol. What's the purpose of the idol? So putting a cross on a pagan idol neutralizes the pagan influence?

If you would add some substance to the conversation it wouldn't be so one sided. But I understand, it's hard to find substance in an empty head.

Wrong Psalm 33 5 He loves righteousness and justice; The earth is full of the goodness of the Lord. John 16 33 These things I have spoken to you, that in Me you may have peace. In the world you will have tribulation; but be of good cheer, I have overcome the world.” .

So if Paul is a false prophet, all of his writing's, like the verse below, are false and cannot be considered a part of scripture? Right? 2 Timothy 3 16 All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness...

If this is true, why are Paul's writings found in the bible?