Search results

Per the RCC, so called "baptism" is a way to con parents into staying around as their infants receive so called "remission of sins" that they have not yet even committed. "Repent"? Not a chance.

The Bible says Jesus was conceived. God knows that humans know what "conception" entails. Catholics bury their head in the sand like elementary school kids when the word arises. It's a wonder that Catholics even know how to procreate.

Barf!

Anther admission by the Catholic that the name of Jesus is not used in the baptism ritual of their mass.

No, the RCC tells the infant to his little oblivious face, that he is baptized in the name of the Father, son and Holy Ghost, without saying "Jesus", as the name of the son. Also, the kid has no idea this is going on, or that the creep in a robe is wetting his head for no reason but to get...

Great, so you believe God became a sperm/egg embryo? God and Mary together, by combining God's created sperm with Mary's egg, both made "God the Son", as we see in the gospels? Was this the microscopic beginning of his physical life source? The word became this?

The RCC and yourself do not know what the name of the son is. They are blind to this. It is a phenomenon at the highest level. It can only be discerned if they are released from the enemy at God's command. The enemy will do anything to keep the name of Jesus from the RCC during baptism. The...

There is not. The contradiction comes to those that do not know what the name of the son is. Those folks are anti-Acts 2:38, which Peter understood as the name of the son. Peter was smarter than every Catholic alive today.

Okay, so you teach God was manifested as a sperm cell(flesh), right?

Yes, we are in Christ, not each other. The Catholics are not in Christ, but a "believers lodge" with a grand poobah.

For calling creeds a false doctrine?

It was the invisible introduction only. The best is yet to come in person.

The only similar passage of sun, moon and 12 stars is the dream of Joseph. The woman of Rev 12 is wrapped in the founders of Israel.

No, your priests purposely omit the name of Jesus as they sprinkle droplets of water in their initiation of infants into the RCC. It is not baptism, but an initiation rite as the Moose/Elks lodges are. This is precisely why they avoid the "annoying" name of Jesus. They cringe at Acts 2:38.

On the contrary, you are not part of the 3000 at Pentecost as a rejectionist of Acts 2:38. Every sin you have ever committed is on you. You are a fierce opponent of Acts 2:38, which makes you an opponent to Peter, the Apostles and the 3000. You better leave the RCC before doomsday comes.

Okay, so God became a microscopic cell, correct?

I joined Christ, which united me to the 3000 at Pentecost. You were "christened" into the RCC.

Those that are allowed to read and apply Romans 10 have formerly passed through Acts 2:38. Nobody otherwise can apply those books(Epistles) to their lives.

No, the name of Jesus was not mentioned during your infant baptism, which disqualifies you from remission of sins in stereo.

Luther was a former RCC stepping stone out of the dark ages.