Search results

18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: 19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his...

Barf!

3=1? Is this Catholic math? I know the RCC opposed science in the dark ages, but they also oppose modern math?

Acts 2:38 is a faithless invention? Peter invented it? Maybe Peter disobeyed Jesus per Matt 28:19? Maybe Jesus blew it giving Peter the keys in Matt 16? Maybe the Catholic does not understand what Peter did when he commanded baptism in the name of the son, Jesus?

Types, to a minimum. False religions have a tendency to "type" themselves into crazy doctrines. The book of Rev is 99.9% literal with a few minor "types" to give clarity to the literal subject.

Looks good.

You and your phony scholar daughters are all protestors of Acts 2:38. All of you are the real Protestants. The RCC is the mother of all Protestants. You know it is true. All of you despise Acts 2:38 and spend your entire existence trying to debunk it.

Catholic math goes like this.... 1+1+1=1....lol

That’s not what Rev 13:8 and Col 1 says

Wait, you are the ORIGINAL protestant vs Acts 2:38 and the 3000 at Pentecost.(You and the RCC protest Peter). You are the culprit. Your RCC group started the commentary rule of many interpretations. Before the RCC came along, it was 1 interpretation and many "applications". You RCC...

You have the "1st person" vs the "2nd person" saying they are the alpha and omega. They must be jockeying for top spot? Or, is it kinda like this?... 24 He that loveth me not keepeth not my sayings: and the word which ye hear is not mine, but the Father's which sent me.

Just to give you a little insight of where God is regarding "time"... 5 Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations. God is smart.

No, it is a different story. The Bible is not interpreted via "principle".

No, Mary was the mother of the son of God, not God(the son). Boy the RCC really messed you folks up.

Do you know what we are when we ass u me something?

So, God is man? Man is God? Interesting. I always thought I read the man Christ Jesus had a God??? Maybe God was inside the man Christ Jesus as he described in John 14?... 10 Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? the words that I speak unto you I speak not of...

2 different stories a thousand years apart.

Divine mother creates a divine son?

My apologies. To be specific, the RCC made up the "multiple meaning" rule that you teach per the book of Rev.

God inside Jesus. Now you are getting it. God speaks, lights up the world and works through His human glorified son.(Col 2:9). .....and all this time you thought the 2 were competing to be alpha/omega.