Search results

I thought if we follow the logic it would mean they are Jesus, but if Jesus is the Most High then I guess they would be the Most High as well.

or sitting at the right hand means your the Father. some of these, like this one, i dont think about going to scripture because the argument is so absurd, we been saying right hand / right hand man for thousands of years, they were using the term when Jesus was teaching. right hand is that one...

when Moses used the word for the Most High, plural form or whatever, any form you want to throw in there, whatever word Moses wrote down for the Most High, did Moses believe that word to mean trinity? so to sum it up: sit at the right hand means one thing "Jesus" and only Jesus sits at the...

nope, not what i said. angels act in the same name as the Father. Father creates a tree = Father creates a tree angels creates a tree = Father creates a tree feel free to continue to ignore this fact and i will continue proving you wrong 2 states, 3 states, 20 states, what ever you say. for...

ok but the whole "sit at the right hand" is still the same either way. this response does not explain anything concerning the phrase and how Jesus and the 12 used the phrase.

is Moses mistaken as well? Moses was the one that wrote down these commands that were given by the Most High. Moses and the Jews understood the Most High to be a non trinity.

the trinity breaks the 1st and 2nd commandments? Exodus 20:2-3 2 “I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery. 3 “You shall have no other gods before me. i saw this right away when i was a young kid. hard to miss that one.

and when the apostles were asking Jesus about sitting at His left hand, this meant the apostles were asking Jesus if they could sit at their own left hands?

goodgravy, did you even understand what i said? lets try it again. my cousin, who says he has the spirit, he said we are all to dress up like tinkerbell fairies and dance naked in the town square singing kermit the frog alphabet songs. guess i will see you up there, i mean, cousin bobo says...

you mean i cant tell people they are going to hell if they do not believe the exact same way i do? wheres the fun in that.

you are correct, it does not prove angels were used, which i have never proclaimed to begin with. what it proves is that angels could have been used and the wording would be the exact same. the reason you gave was refuted with the Sodom and Isaiah examples. we both know this, how do we know...

the reason you gave was refuted with the Sodom and Isiah examples. unless you have evidence where angels act on their own, this point has been refuted. i asked you to make your point, why can you not do that?

So the shamrock does prove the trinity, but only in ireland. Go figure. . . .

Something that's always confusing to me, many in today's Christianity teach that the faith is built on the trinity, some go further saying salvation is based on it. Either way or both you have to admit it's a red flag when there is no teaching in the bible saying this. I get there are proof...

Let's go back to this one, I am assuming, I have to assume because you failed to write anything, that your posting this passage to say I am wrong because you have the spirit and I don't. I made the jim jones response because this is exactly what crazy fanatics do. They can't prove a point with...

Yes the Lord uses them, sometimes He doesn't, and when He does use them the action is still assigned to the Lord just the same as if the were used like the sodom example. It's not the same as you and I creating something and in the end we can argue who did what, when an angel does something...

I agree, I think I did the same on the water, the Lord is not water, water does not contradict itself, the Lord is self aware, not an "it" as in matter(water). I call it word games.

Your claiming that angels did not act in creating because this would make it a co creation and void the idea that the Lord acted alone. I am arguing that angels do not act alone, act on their own authority, they have none, they act for the Lord. When an angel acts, when the Lord acts, either way...

I'm not drinking the kool aid

No problem, just give me an example of angels acting in their own name, I will be waiting. Just make your point, why can you not do that? I get we are both asking questions and you're now accusing me of dodging but I made my point first, you ignored it, and only then was I forced into the basic...