Search results

No, I "criticize Protestant denominations" because they all claim to be guided by the Holy Spirit into the Truth and preaching that Truth based on their interpretation of Scripture even though all their 'truths' disagree with each other. John 14:6 has NOTHING to do with reading Scripture and...

I understand your logic now. Neither is correct. In regard to Bible -> an individual, Scripture says this: 2 Peter 1:20, 2 Peter 3:16! Therefore, Scripture refutes YOUR "logic" on Scripture. Your Bible -> a priest -> an individual "logic" is not based on fact. The THOUSANDS of priest are not...

That still makes no sense. Are you suggesting that Peter's statement ("baptism now saves you") to the people that were standing in front of him 2,000 years ago only applies to them? And that Jesus instructions to baptize all was only to the people that were watching him rise into heaven? Help...

Huh??? That makes no sense. Can you better articulate your position?

Hey Bible Highlighter, If baptism in/with water was not necessary, then why did Peter water baptize Cornelius and his family? Did Peter do something that was unnecessary? It is apparent to Peter that Cornelius has received the Holy Spirit but has not received the sacrament of baptism in an...

hey matthewG, If water baptism doesn't mean anything, then why did Jesus do it and tell us to do it when he said baptize all? 1 Peter 3:21 says baptism now saves you. You say, " baptism of water is not salvation". Who is right? You or Scripture?

Got it. So you belive that the Lord has spoken to you and given you the truth but "paid priests" are not spoken to and given the truth.... I never said I wanted to have a discussion with Titus and Titus only. YOU are the one who interjected yourself into our conversation of which I don't mind...

YOU are the one who said in post #761 that I follow the "unScriptural teachings of the Pope" and that "The Catholic church has lied to you and you are the one who has fallen for the unScriptural teachings." YOU are the one who referred to The Catholic Church. So I ask you again to back up your...

Hi Jim B, I have no problem with your interjection. But when you interject yourself into a conversation that presents a question, shouldn't you answer the question? You failed to do that in your interjection. If the Catholic Church disregards Scripture in favor of the interpretations of...

Hey Jim B, Any teaching that agrees with the Bible according to WHO's interpretation? Protestant denominations teach MULTIPLE different interpretations of the same passages from scripture. According to your theory that "clearly" would be "theatre" also.....;) Curious Mary

You make your own doctrine. You have already made that clear.

That is a dodge and a non-answer.....

I don't see in your response you addressing what we were discussing....baptism...but I digress.

Dear Jim B, You have decided that The Churches teaching is unscriptural. Since you KNOW that what The Church teaches is unscriptural then you must KNOW who's teaching is not unscriptural. Please tell me who's teaching is Scriptural. patient Mary

Jim B, Your "response", which is an interjection into a conversation between Titus and I, does not address my question. It only begs me to ask the same question: The truth according to WHO'S interpretation of His words? The Baptist? Lutherans? Methodists? They all preach a different "truth"...

Hmmm....So YOU decide who twist Scripture and who doesn't. And your Protestant men's interpretation of Scripture is not twisted? Which one? The Baptist? Lutherans? Methodists? They all preach a different "truth". Which one is the "truth"? Can you not see how your theory doesn't work?

And your interpretation suggests that any man could make up doctrine OPPOSITE of the Apostles teaching. Either you are lying to yourself, or some man lied to you and you fell for it.

You should read Scripture before you give your OPINION on it: But some believers who belonged to the sect of the Pharisees stood up and said, “It is necessary for them to be circumcised and ordered to keep the law of Moses.” 6 The apostles and the elders met together to consider this matter...

Oh the lies your men have taught you. The Catholic Church did not add books to the Bible. The label “unscriptural” was first applied by the Protestant Reformers of the 16th century. The truth is, portions of these books contradict elements of Protestant doctrine and the “reformers” therefore...

Hebrews 13:17 destroys your theory......