Search results

Why didn't you include Acts 2:38, 4:12, 8, 10 and 19 per baptism incidents? Shall I? I shall.... 38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.... 12 Neither is...

Let me clarify. You obeyed Jesus via Peter via Acts 2:38.

It looks to me like this person obeys Acts 2:38 like the 3000 at Pentecost did. He is saved per Peter. Good man!

This is a lie?.... 38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. Or, are modernists telling us a whopper?

Peter did not obey Peter per this?... 38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. ......the Apostles were "rules for thee and not for me" like democrats today?

38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. Is this a red flag to Peter or modernists?

Never heard of that guy. I read Acts 2. It explicitly says this.... 38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. Are you in full agreement with Peter, partial...

Wait... Jesus never spoke in tongues..correct. Those that Jesus entered into spoke in tongues. This happened at Pentecost(Acts 2). This was when the NT started. This is where we start. We are not required to pluck out our eyes since Acts 2:38 became our remission of sins. Aren't you glad...

Would Peter agree with this?... 38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.

I am not. However, they got it right concerning Acts 2:38.

You still don't get it Dan. It is not the water, but the NAME OF JESUS CHRIST invoked while in the water. That is how our sins are remitted...by invoking the name of the very person we all murdered while in the water. This justifies Jesus.

Would you rather pluck out your eye per Jesus' OT words when you see a hot chick or be baptized in the name of Jesus for the remission of your sins per NT?

I am saying that Acts 2:38 was the official NT requirement for salvation. Jesus gave them the Holy Ghost and power to remit sins etc at Acts 2. Prior to that, the testator had not died and they were stuck in the previous testament. This is precisely why we don't have to self amputate etc, to...

They did not believe? How did you know? Did you ask?

Is repentance a repentance god? Is receiving the Holy Ghost a spirit god?

Acts 2:38 represents a water god to you? Okay, is Jesus' name a name god?

Jesus had not died yet. Acts 2:38 was the fulfillment of the great commission. Prior to his death, they were not required to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of the sins. The testator had to die to institute the New Testament. You are stuck in the wrong Testament.

Right, thus they must believe then be baptized per Mark 16:16.

Phillip in Acts understood Mark 16:16. He required the eunuch to believe before baptism. Modernists require belief OR unbelief before baptism? Is this how they process unbelievers getting baptized per Mark 16:16?

Only dumb people think Jesus meant this... 16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not AND IS NEVERTHELESS BAPTIZED shall be damned.