Search results

I think it is black and white on the human scale of cognizance that subjorns faith in God as biblically defined. If we accept the Bible as God's words, do we then in our way of thinking deny what God tells us as pertains to God and God's identity? If the New testament is to be balanced it must...

There is a proposition regarding the source of the Old testament. For instance, the word Elohim. Often thought to be another name for God. However, it isn't. It is a plural word that is found some 2500 times in the Old testament . A label that encapsulates a group of god's. And there were...

I remember reading they can still accept salvation during the great tribulation.

I think those responsible for cutting construction corners on this initial project should face justice for their indifference to safety. How can someone live with themselves, if their indifference helped to cause this bridge structure to totally collapse?

This is historic. The eclipse passes through three countries. Canada, the U. S, and Mexico. I'm sure I'll catch this on YouTube.

I think it is in Genesis 6 God had regretted creating humans. I would say God does care more for God than us. God does whatever God wants.

I'd appreciate serious responses to this inquiry. I'm surprised at the degrading humor considering the issue.

A colleague sent me this the other day. https://www.christianlearning.com/blood-of-jesus#amp_ct=1711334573271&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=17113345391578&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.christianlearning.com%2Fblood-of-jesus Hoax or legitimate?

Lots to take in there. Thank you for taking the time.

I happened on this today. It is not relevant to the OP however, it is an astronomical event slated to occur this autumn...

What if the need for the gift was not a break but a plan?

Forgive my lack of understanding here. Where do the gentiles fit in. Under what tribe or house do non-Jews belong?

Yes. The entire configuration is of God. Pre-planned before creation, the created had to fall. And then turn to the source of the fall to save them.

Happy to elaborate. The consequence of not accepting the free gift is contingent upon a gift being offered as necessary in the first place. Because of the human sin condition. The offering is afforded by the same entity, God, that created the condition first. Making the later gift God's...

Would you say the consequence of refusing the gift is remaining as born, condemned? Is that then a consequence or a condition of being born?

Yes, that is the standard meaning of free. No payment, no effort to attain. However, "only", in your statement implies a condition otherwise?

So, for clarification, only Jews are invited into the new covenant?

What is your non standard dogma then?

Are we to understand the Redemption covenant, the new covenant, is only for Israel and Jews? Or, does not qualify as a covenant?

Please explain your reasoning there.