Search results

then why does the kjv have so many errors? why do Jesus and the 12 quote the LXX which was ignored in the kjv? are you claiming this is the original text?

If you were wrong on something, how would someone go about proving it?

Maybe this is the problem because you are wrong quite often. Denying it doesn't change the facts. I don't believe that for a second. But to start an entire thread proclaiming all these folks that debunked your theories need immediate prayer is pretty sad. It's a bad case of sour grapes. Have...

Who is naruto?

Ok but this is an entire thread based on you claiming that anyone that disagrees with you needs praying for as if their soul is in danger because they don't agree with you. You get proved wrong a lot, sorry about that, but don't you think this is a bit much. When I was young and just learning...

Why does it bother you so much that people have their own opinions?

i remember! he did a lecture on Arius and Athanasius the Arius controversy. i will respond more later but i have to take a break or my wife is gonna throw the computer in the backyard.

i watched a lecture called When Jesus Became God but it was bart ehrman who im not the biggest fan of, a bit of a sellout IMO. i know that rubenstein name but cant place him. im gonna have to look him up i think you may be right about the leaders at the top. but maybe not so much of the local...

and any work they do is the Lords work, not their own which is what i been saying all along.

interesting that you take time out to claim its same question. a question you refuse to answer. take time out to define "rephrase" take time out to tell me the answer does not apply. take time out to tell me to refer to another post. take time out repeating same statement that was refuted...

do you know of any examples in scripture where angels were sent from the Father, acted independently in their own name and then returned to the heavens?

says the ones killing and destroying everything.

No it's a different question. 1) who destroyed? 2) were they destroyed in an angel way or the Lords way? you see? 2 different questions. i think what you meant to say was the end result of both questions is your argument being refuted. thats the same.

This is a new question but it's ok as I knew you would refuse to answer anyway. Everytime you get proved wrong you bury your head in the sand, rewind back a few steps, and start over with the statement that just got proved wrong. They have some mainstream Christian forum where if you question...

At least the gnostics weren't burning people alive and torturing people.

When sodom was destroyed was it done in the way of angels or the way of the Lord?

Do you think there is an agenda behind the trinity? Or you think it was a genuine attempt to explain things for people to understand? One thing that always bothered me is in the days of Jesus and the 12, they were just another Jewish sect practicing judaism, a few hundred years later you have 2...

Yeah, when the Father sends someone, angel, spirit,etc, it's still an act of G-D, they know what it is and what it proves. But they will never admit it no matter how many times you prove them wrong.

No what you did is basically say it's wrong because I say it's wrong, not very credible.

The sodom destruction proves you wrong. You know this.