Search results

The Reformers were all amils. Therefore, you would identify them all as occultists, and the Reformation as occultic. Therefore, Martin Luther was an occultist. Therefore John Wycliffe, who authored the first complete English Bible translation, was an occultist, and his translation was...

Anyone who believes in a future millennium of animal sacrifices, believes what "Orthodox unbelieving Jews" believe. Is that whom you're referring to? Yes, it's easy to see who they are.

False. Justin Martyr acknowledged amil at least two hundred years before the initial appearance of institutionalized apostasizing Romanism. Your faux historicist history is as distorted as your scripture.

That's pure modernist dispen/premil, the modernist incarnation of ancient pharisaic talmudism. When Christ didn't establish a carnal kingdom, the pharisees set out to kill Him. Today, modernist dispen/premil claims that the kingdom was "postponed". :laughing: Abject nonsense.

More private faux "historicism". No recognized Reformation historicist ever subscribed to such futurized fantasy and fallacy. FYI Isaiah and Zechariah are in the OT. :laughing: Reformation historicist John Calvin: Isaiah 11:4 Here we must again call to remembrance what is the nature of...

Amos 9:9 “For behold, I am commanding, And I will shake the house of Israel among all nations As grain is shaken in a sieve, But not a kernel will fall to the ground. Matthew 23 13 But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye...

Matthew 23 13 But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in. 33 Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?

Your error is attempting to replace the NT with the OT, in clear violation of Hebrews 8:6; 8:13; 9:15; 10:9 et al. You deny the Scriptural meaning, significance, and operation of wills and testaments. That denial is a clear manifestation of cultism.

Yes, dispens think that the D in DNA means Devil. :laughing:

You, I, and the entirety of humanity possess both Jewish and Gentile DNA. There is no such thing as a purebred Jewish race. Abraham is a genetic ancestor of us all. Zionism's racism and dispensationalism's racism are no different from Hitler's aryanism. All are abominations.

Your zionist racialization is a bankrupt vacuity both Scripturally and scientifically. Genetically, you and I and everyone on the planet are both Jew and Gentile, because after thousands of years of natural genetic dispersion and diffusion, Jewish DNA is ubiquitous throughout humanity, and...

Yeah. Continuing cultism on parade.

You've been shown examples of apocalyptic imagery. Your denials are irrelevant.

It certainly was Peter's intention, otherwise he would not have said "This is that". I believe Peter. You don't.

But they didn't go out when Babylon, Idumea, and Egypt were destroyed.

Sound arguments against cultism.

OT examples below of apocalyptic imagery describing prophecies fulfilled long ago, having nothing to do with "latter days". Joel 2 uses similar imagery. Peter declares "this is that" in the present tense. I believe Joel and Peter. Isaiah describes the destruction of Babylon. Isaiah 13 10...

Acts 2:16-21 represents the initial fulfillment of Joel's prophecy, and the continuation of the fulfillment of that prophecy ever since, up to this moment in time, for every individual who "calls on the name of the Lord". Acts 2:21 Joel 2:30-32 was gloriously fulfilled in the birth of the NT...

Couldn't agree more, brother. And cult it is, one of the most abhorrent examples on this forum.

Colossians 1 13 Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son: Romans 8 35 Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword? 36 As it is written...