Search results

Who is the Israel that "the new covenant guarantees a converted heart as the foundation of all her blessings". By what does God identify them? 1. Their race 2. Their religion 3. Their culture 4. Their domicile 5. Their faithfulness and obedience to God and His Son ? Tip: God is not a...

The JVL, which you quoted, confirms that the Romans destroyed the physical city and sanctuary. The temple was destroyed. Only the western "wailing" wall was left standing. "When the Romans razed the Second Temple, they left one outer wall standing. They probably would have destroyed that wall...

I'll take Paul's bumf over yours. :laughing: Every time.

Paul was consistent in distinguishing between spiritual and physical temples. Paul's temples: "naos" spiritual: 1 Corinthians 3:16 Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you? In Context | Full Chapter | Other Translations Greek 1 Corinthians 3:17 If...

The people of the prince who destroyed the city and sanctuary were the Romans, so the prince was the prince of the Romans. Who do think the prince was? It happened in 70 AD. Nothing future about it.

You've been telling us that it's the Romans, who destroyed the city and sanctuary.

We know who the people of the prince are. But you don't know who the prince is?

Let's continue exploring your futurized fantasies and fallacies. Who is the prince in Daniel 9:26?

You disbelieve the rabbis, the elite of your chosen people? For shame. :laughing: Before succumbing to delirious ecstasy about hyperbole, be aware that it originates with a nucleus of truth. Sorry to puncture your bubble.

Yes, the Jews never damaged so much as one square micrometer of Jerusalem, because they knew that the dispens would be claiming such. :laughing: You were saying? :laughing: The Wars of the Jews Book VI However, the cloister was full of those that were gone up the ladders; at which time...

Yes, according to the dispenarrative, Jerusalem and the temple were destroyed, but not one Jew went hungry. They all had three squares every day. :laughing: More dispenitis. As for your delusion that Jews were not responsible for the destruction of the city and temple: "In later...

Were Jews destroyed when their fellow Jews starved them to death? And drove them to cannibalism? Obviously you consider their destruction inconsequential compared to the temple. Typical dispenitis. :laughing:

You're utterly incapable of refuting the Jews' own admission that they "caused suffering as great as any the Romans inflicted", so your only recourse is risibly impotent denials of unassailable historical realities. AKA standard dispen procedure. :laughing:

Whom to believe? 1. Jews who acknowledge that Jews "caused suffering as great as any the Romans inflicted", upon their own countrymen. 2. Dispens willfully ignorant of history who deny the Jews' own acknowledged complicity against their own countrymen. Who needs a hint? :laughing:

Never expect a dispen to recognize or understand history. But there it is. From the Jews themselves. Don't you dare disbelieve your chosen people. :laughing: "Outside Jerusalem, Roman troops prepared to besiege the city; inside the city, the Jews were engaged in a suicidal civil war. In...

You're obviously unaware that Merriam-Webster didn't write the Daniel 9:24 definition of "determined." What's your excuse? Strong's Exhaustive Concordance determine A primitive root; properly, to cut off, i.e. (figuratively) to decree -- determine. Seventy weeks are "cut off" according to...

If it is not complete, then it is not determined. But Daniel said that "70 weeks are determined." That includes the 70th week. So your claim is false.

True. And?

Daniel 9:24 claims that "Seventy weeks are determined". What do you claim?

Does the rest of Daniel 9 disprove Daniel 9:24?