Search results

There was a 70th week of Daniel 2,000 years ago. All fulfilled because it was determined. Daniel 9:24

Complete nonsense. He could not "went to the Father from this world" without first coming into this world. Thank God for His Chosen People, His elect beloved faithful obedient remnant of both Gentiles and Jews in whom He has preserved His Truth through the ages, culminating with His New...

Do you belong to a cult of your own fabrication? Revelation 1 18 I am he that liveth, and was dead; and, behold, I am alive for evermore, Amen; and have the keys of hell and of death. He came. Whether you believe it or not. :laughing:

The Lord's Supper is NT Scripture's final word regarding the observation of the ordinance of His Sacrifice by His Church. There is no subsequent word. It is not replaced.

You avoided the question. Do you think that your temple rituals will then replace the Lord's Supper?

Do you think that your temple rituals will then replace the Lord's Supper?

Your temple rituals are conspicuously nonexistent in the New Testament. Here is the Christ-affirming ordinance in the NT Church that has transcended and replaced any such rituals: 1 Corinthians 11 23 For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, that the Lord Jesus the...

Anything to avoid Christ at Calvary, eh? And His complete and perfect fulfillment Scripturally, historically, and grammatically. Nothing to argue about. :laughing:

All fulfilled, as shown.

Any Jew who acts upon that is destined for hell. Didn't happen in Numbers 21:6 or Numbers 25:9 or on other occasions. Unprecedented and impossible, as the Scripture you cited below itself declares. So that they see with their eyes, but do not perceive; they hear with their ears, but do not...

In Daniel 9:27 "he" is Messiah the Prince of Daniel 9:25, as Messiah the Prince is the grammatical antecedent/referent to which "he" ultimately refers. Confirmed in Matthew 26:28 and fulfilled at Calvary. Hebrews 9:15-16 All 70 weeks have been "determined" (Daniel 9:24), and the covenant...

You are correct re. Daniel 9 written in Hebrew. My oversight. Strong's Interlinear translates directly from Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. It includes "he" in Daniel 9:27 because a covenant is between persons. Because "he" was and is Messiah the Prince. Who announced His New Covenant in...

I'm confident in the Greek - English translator's competence.

Plug וְהִגְבִּ֥יר into the Greek - English translator. See the "he"?

If you're saying that there is no antichrist in Daniel 9:24-27, I certainly agree. There is Christ, the Messiah the Prince, in the passage. There is no antichrist in the passage.

It doesn't. It refers to "he", part of the complex expression "וְהִגְבִּ֥יר" which is a "Conj‑w | V‑Hifil‑ConjPerf‑3ms" expression. "He" appears in the wide majority of English Bible translations.

The OT Hebrew/Aramaic scholars disagree with you. 1396 [e] wə·hiḡ·bîr וְהִגְבִּ֥יר And he shall confirm Conj‑w | V‑Hifil‑ConjPerf‑3ms

There's no reference to "the believer" in the passage. There is repeated reference to Messiah the Prince. What is incorrect?

Did the covenant confirm itself with itself? :laughing:

Paul's "naos" temples all refer to the believer, collectively the Church. Paul wasn't a false Jew. :laughing: Paul's temples: "naos" spiritual: 1 Corinthians 3:16 Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you? In Context | Full Chapter | Other...