Search results

The beasts are one the earth long before the fallen angles arrive. The fallen angels fall to earth at the 6th seal. Revelation 6 12 And I beheld when he had opened the sixth seal, and, lo, there was a great earthquake; and the sun became black as sackcloth of hair, and the moon became as blood...

Your answer is correct. However, the chart is way off. There are not 5 stages of the little horn. There are two beasts that you have combined into one. There is no Gog Magog war until after the 1000 years.

Donald Trump serves two terms as President which represents 2 years. Then Donald Jr. two terms representing 2 years. Then Eric Trump two terms representing 2 years. Then finally, Barron Trump is the last Trump. And we know what happens at the Last Trump. If if and butts was candy and...

Well. I guess you could start out by providing a scripture that shows that the Antichrist is Greek. I don't believe you can do that.

False. Please provide scripture to support your claim There are two beasts, one is the beast of the sea who was and is not and will come again, and the beast of the earth who has two horns. None of the candidates mentioned are feasible. You are looking in the wrong place.

Is there proof that Trump idolizes Apollo/Nimrod/Apollyon?

And yet the Temple destruction is foretold in Luke as well as Daniel. Which is why you felt it necessary to limit your question to Daniel so you could have an excuse as to why you have no sign when there was not one stone upon another at the Temple site. The reason you are unable to provide a...

You should be careful playing stupid. Odds are it sticks. Luke 21 5 And as some spake of the temple, how it was adorned with goodly stones and gifts, he said, 6 As for these things which ye behold, the days will come, in the which there shall not be left one stone upon another, that shall not...

Great. So why can't you answer the question. If there is not one stone upon another, what was the sign when it happened? I don't expect much, as you have yet to figure out the Lord is coming in a time you think not.

Ah. You need another reminder. You forgot what hyperbolically means. "In later generations, the rabbis hyperbolically declared that the revolt's failure, and the Temple's destruction, was due not to Roman military superiority but to causeless hatred (sinat khinam) among the Jews (Yoma 9b)."...

So now you admit that the Romans destroyed the city of Jerusalem and the Temple? They did. However, the second Temple is not what the prophecy is referring to. The western wall is part of the buildings of the Temple. If the prophecy was fulfilled as most deem, what sign was there when it...

Contrary to popular opinion, there is still one stone upon another in the buildings of the Temple. Luke 21 6 As for these things which ye behold, the days will come, in the which there shall not be left one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down. 7 And they asked him, saying...

You attempted to provide proof that Jews destroyed their own city of Jerusalem and the second Temple. From your own article of proof, I showed you where it was the Romans that destroyed the city of Jerusalem and the 2nd Temple. The people of the prince that shall come that destroy the city of...

You have no clue who the people of the prince are.

Well, unknown to most at this time.

The prince in Daniel 9:26 is unknown at this time.

"During the summer of 70, the Romans breached the walls of Jerusalem, and initiated an orgy of violence and destruction. Shortly thereafter, they destroyed the Second Temple. This was the final and most devastating Roman blow against Judea."

So you still don't understand what hyperbolically means. Standard.

Mmmm. Still trying to claim the Jews destroyed their own city and Temple? I'll repost from the end of your article of supposed truth that you seem incapable of understanding. "During the summer of 70, the Romans breached the walls of Jerusalem, and initiated an orgy of violence and...

Oh boy. In LATER GENERATIONS the rabbis hyperbolically declared "In later generations, the rabbis hyperbolically declared that the revolt's failure, and the Temple's destruction, was due not to Roman military superiority but to causeless hatred (sinat khinam) among the Jews (Yoma 9b)."...