Search results

Lol...I have addressed this "argument" already and I am not arguing with you. I am simply putting ALL of what Jesus and Paul said concerning His body and blood into context. Jesus compared himself to REAL bread (manna) saying we must eat him. He then held up bread and said it IS his body/blood...

Yup, man can not live on bread alone. Read that passage IN CONTEXT Ferris. He fasted forty days and forty nights, and afterwards he was famished. Satan then suggested that Jesus turn the stones into bread so he could eat. That passage PARTIALLY refers to actual food to keep your physical body...

Lol...no, you are doing more than resisting the corruption. You are resisting the doctrine also. Just because the men are corrupt (sinful) their sins do not corrupt the truth of the doctrine. If that were true then the sins of your men would corrupt the doctrine they put forth and you adhere to.

Oh goodness.....

Ditto....

Sooooo your men have turned "give us this day our daily bread" into we need to read the bible everyday? Is that what you are saying?

Cmon' Ferris. Think about what you are saying. Catholic theology is so far out in left field??? Do you agree with the theology of the Trinity? Or that Jesus claimed to be God and is? Do you agree that there are 27 books in the NT? If so, you agree with Catholic theology/teachings.....

Lol...you literally quoted a man (Eusebious) to back up what you have been taught but then say you only trust the words of Jesus and the Apostles?? Soooo do you trust what Eusebious said or not?

The demons never said they were in the meat that was sacrificed to the false gods. Jesus said he was in the bread. So did Paul. Kapish? In regard to your Berean theory: That is another lie your protestant men have told you; Be a Berean and confirm everything you are told with Scripture and if...

No, you don't follow Jesus and the Apostles. If you did you would agree with Jesus when he said this (the bread) IS my body. Your answer to Paul's question would be YES Paul, eating the bread IS a participation in the body of Christ. You DO follow men that teach OPPOSITE of that but you do not...

So you trust Eusebius, a man who lived 200 years after the death of the last Apostle, and your men of the Protestant revolution, who lived 1,500 years after the death of the last Apostles, OVER a student of an Apostle? Hmmmm.....Even though the students of the Apostles agree with Jesus and Paul...

I would believe you, but I choose to believe Him. He TOLD you must eat His body. He equated His body to the bread (actual food, manna) that our ancestors ate. The unbelievers then (and now) asked how can this man give us his flesh to eat? He then SHOWED us how at the last supper when he equated...

Jesus was ludicrous then also: Luke 22:19

And you are still dodging your pussy cat reference. Why? Was it meant to be derogatory?

Yup, in those days the pagans had sacrifices in which they were actually eating something (meat) and drinking something (blood). That is why Paul equated the bread (meat) and wine (blood) with the 'cup of demons'. No, I imply that what pagans sacrifice, they sacrifice to demons and not to...

Hey Devin, Fyi...The Catholic Church does have "married clergy".

Hey Devin, What did Timothy write? I am not familiar with his writings! Curious Mary

Hey Devin, FYI there are married Catholic priests! Timothy didn't give any advice. "Timothy" is a letter from Paul TO Timothy! It was Paul giving Timothy advice. Mary

So which is it Jimbo? Is Peter the rock upon which Jesus built the church (Matthew 16:18) OR is a "Christ-denier" Satan and a stumbling block? What have your men taught you?

Hi Pearl, The other periods of "climate change" was a mini-ice age about 1650 with another about 1770 and the last one in 1850! Also, where the Mendenhall glacier is now was once a forest of trees about 1,000 years ago. Not sure why the climate change believers think that what we are...