Search results

Daniel 11 is about Antiochus Epiphanes. It has nothing to do with Daniel 9. There is not one recognized defender of the true faith in 17 centuries of historical NT Christian orthodoxy who interprets the Daniel 9:27 Covenant Confirmer as anyone other than Christ. Not one. Every modernist...

Thanks for confirming the blasphemy.

Just answer the question. Is it "Christ", or is it "antichrist"?

Who is the Covenant Confirmer (Matthew 26:28) in Daniel 9:27? They won't, because they've been blasphemous since Calvary. Luke 21:20 NT occurrences of the word "fulfilled": 81 NT occurrences of the word "unfulfilled": 0 :laughing:

There is never any doubt as to Whom the various descriptors of Jesus are referring to. Conversely, dispen believes it can hang the "antichrist" sign on anything that it believes comports with its illegitimate conjured hermeneutic of private interpretation, without passing the most basic tests...

Looks like Francisco Ribera, the apostate papacy's Jesuit "Father of Futurism", has snagged another one. :laughing:

Quote any verse containing the word "antichrist" outside of John's epistles. So you sacrificed an animal for your salvation? Daniel and Matthew refer to the abomination of desolation. Luke identifies it as the armies which desolated Jerusalem. It's been and will be fulfilled for everyone who...

Exactly as God planned. Acts 2:23 Only by John. Not in the dispen imagination. With an animal sacrifice? Yes. Daniel 9:27, Matthew 24:15, and Luke 21:20 are inter-corrobative. Fulfilled in the glorious, complete, and perfect accomplishments of Christ at Calvary. Everything in Daniel...

1 John 2 22 Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. 23 Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father... Who are the "faithful Jews" faithful to? :laughing:

Messiah the Prince came. Did you know? Correct grammar is essential for correct application. The only references are in John's epistles. The rest are in the dispen imagination. They could not save after Calvary. The abomination of desolation is clearly identified in Luke 21:20. There is...

Israel without Christ has no identity. There are no identity thieves because there is nothing to steal. :laughing:

The Israel of Satan and Jack: Romans 2 28 For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: Revelation 3 9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to...

Satan's and Jack's "true Jews": :laughing: Romans 2 28 For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: Revelation 3 9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will...

Scripture identifies outward Jews (Satan's and Jack's Jews), and inward Jews (God's Jews). No mention of "true Jews". :laughing:

Daniel 9 27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many The grammatical antecedent/referent of "he" is "Messiah the Prince". Daniel's grammar was flawless nondispensational grammar. Because, as you should know, John is the only writer to use and describe "antichrist". Yes, the Roman armies...

Correction needed. :laughing: Satan's and Jack's Jews: Romans 2 28 For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: Revelation 3 9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie...

Satan's Jews: Romans 2 28 For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: Revelation 3 9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship...

Messiah is the Prince who came 2,000 years ago and confirmed His Covenant with many at Calvary. Matthew 26:28 Where does John refer to antichrist as a prince? Not in the OT. You tell us. You're the one attempting to decapitate your undetermined 70th week and associate it with your...

Not if an expected rapture does not materialize. The word "rapture" or any implication thereof was completely nonexistent in the Reformation.

He is the prince who came 2,000 years ago and confirmed His Covenant with many at Calvary. Matthew 26:28 There is no OT name of "antichrist". The word does not exist in the OT. There is no tribulation, no antichrist, and no 1000 year reign in the 70th week, which was determined and fulfilled...