Search results

No, "Iesous" was given to Joseph/Mary. "Yeshua" was made in China.

The new covenant started in Acts 2 officially. The Holy Ghost was poured out in Acts 2. The prerequisites were all met at His death.

Now, you recently called Peter a heretic. This is your red flag. You oopsied here. You know the only way to fix it is to know that Jesus, giving Peter the Keys, which he used in Acts 2(Jews), Acts 8(Samaritans) and Acts 10(Gentiles), was spot on. So, as you admit that Peter was spot on, then...

Is Acts 2:38 Grace or Law?

It was assembled in a particular order such as this... Take a sinner to the gospels to give them something to believe in. Then take the sinner to Acts 2:38 as they repent, so they can obtain remission of sins per water baptism in the name of Jesus Christ(and also become Spirit filled). Then...

Yes, but in the nameless titles, like the Catholics are.

Did you all know that the Epistles were written to folks that previously obeyed Acts 2:38, and not to sinners and those that disobeyed it? Did you all ever notice that your NT was placed in a specific order to read and react to? For example.... Matt-John....gospels to sinners. Acts...record...

Has Christianity finally evolved from harsh Acts 2:38 to a better, easy path of "think/believe" to be saved? Shall God honor the new stuff?

Can one disobey Acts 2:38 and be right with God? Could the 3000 at Pentecost have merely dismissed Peter and "confessed Jesus" instead? Well, they do it now.

Questions to anyone... What is the name of the Father? What is the name of the son? What is the name of the Holy Ghost?

Maybe Peter knew something that Christendom does not? Jesus said "I am come in my Father's name"=Jesus name belonged to the Father first(Heb 1:4).... The Father's name is Jesus The name of the son is..... "Jesus". "The Holy Ghost will be sent in my name"...the name of the Holy Ghost is Jesus.

Lambast? Telling my fellow humans to obey Acts 2:38 is lambasting them? Man, Peter was the king of lambasters. He lambasted 3000 in one day per Acts 2, then lambasted the gentiles in Acts 10. What a legalist meany.

Acts 2:38 is brutally legal. It is the first command to sinners that asked Peter what to do about their sins. I would consider Acts 2:38 the foundation of the Church.

Can I start calling you son now?

If you also disobeyed Acts 2:38, make it 96%.

Does Acts 2:38 seem like Latin to you? Actually, I was freed from my Catholic roots by obeying Acts 2:38.

Exactly what modern protestant theology teaches as they snuggle with the RCC.

no rules pics - Google Search Good, last days, Christian t shirts.

Actually, that is frighteningly correct. He is looking for the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of folks' sins. Should he ignore it to appeal to our emotional appetites? Could the priest skip the brazen laver in the tabernacle? Is God a "no rules" God? Or, are we surrounded by "no...

Wouldn't that implicate Jesus for giving Peter the keys in Matt 16 as short sighted?