Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. C

    Romans 11:25 - Partially blinded

    There are two different "they's" in Romans 11:28. Never and nowhere in Scripture are enemies of the gospel ever numbered with the election. Never and nowhere in Scripture do the twain meet unless and until the former as individuals accept Christ, and are then numbered with the latter. Paul...
  2. C

    There are 2 tribulation periods, the “first” is to the Jews

    Bro, I'm looking at Chris's online Scholar's Edition of his epic The Atonement Clock. Is there any of that explanation in there?
  3. C

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    The beginning of their discourse cites: "Reference: Jeremiah 31:31–34 Fulfillment: Matthew 26:28; Mark 14:24; Luke 22:20; 1 Corinthians 11:25; 2 Corinthians 3:6; Hebrews 7:22, 8:6–13, 9:15, 10:14-18, 12:24" Obviously they affirm that those Scriptures fit in. If you don't believe that those...
  4. C

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    I said: Some required reading by the Messianic Jews for Jesus. They understand the New Covenant. Who do you think "they" are?
  5. C

    There are 2 tribulation periods, the “first” is to the Jews

    The only individual identified as a prince in Daniel 9:24-27 is Messiah the Prince. The grammatical referent/antecedent of "the prince" in verse 26 is "Messiah the Prince" in verse 25. There is no other "someone" prince.
  6. C

    There are 2 tribulation periods, the “first” is to the Jews

    If they are not consecutive, then they are not determined. But Daniel 9:24 declares "Seventy weeks are determined..." Therefore, they must be consecutive and contiguous, which prohibits decapitation.
  7. C

    There are 2 tribulation periods, the “first” is to the Jews

    Daniel 9:24 declares "Seventy weeks are determined...". But if the 70th week has not yet begun, then 70 weeks are not determined. Only 69 are determined. That 70th week is decapitated and undetermined. Nor can it be called the 70th, because 70 follows 69. The historical true Christian...
  8. C

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    Some required reading by the Messianic Jews for Jesus. They understand the New Covenant. They recognize and celebrate the extant reality of the New Covenant. And they refute and repudiate dispensational doubt and denial of the New Covenant. Convincingly and cogently.
  9. C

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    Where do you think a 1st century Jew's mind would have gone at the affirmation of the New Testament in Hebrews 9:15-17?
  10. C

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    This one. Hebrews 9 15 And for this cause he is the mediator of the new testament, that by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the first testament, they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance. 16 For where a testament is, there...
  11. C

    Romans 11:25 - Partially blinded

    Who are "special" Israel? What identifying characteristics make them special to God? 1. Their DNA 2. Their religion 3. Their culture 4. Their domicile 5. Their faithfulness and obedience to God and His Son 6. Something else
  12. C

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    It's in Thayer/Strong. You deny it because it exposes your error, as I've explained previously. Do those verses talk about the "heavenly" genitive?
  13. C

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    Hebrews 11:16 is about the heavenly genitive, not land. There are more category 1 heavenly genitives than category 2. Because Thayer/Strong put it there, and I recognize and respect their erudition and competence.
  14. C

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    Let's debunk your "genitive" bunk. :laughing: From Hebrews 11:16 Greek: 2032 [e] epouraniou ἐπουρανίου . a heavenly [one] Adj-GFS Click 2032 above. What do you see? Yeah. It's the definition of the "heavenly" genitive. If you're not completely blind, you can see that a verse using that...
  15. C

    The Root question of Amillenial vs Premillenial

    Yes, for 17 centuries the historical orthodox true Christian Church was entirely heathen and pagan until the dispensational futurites appeared. Keep those gems coming. :laughing:
  16. C

    The Root question of Amillenial vs Premillenial

    Yes, "modern" aptly and accurately describes the fallacies and fantasies of the Darby/Scofield dispensational futurism that you promulgate. It was nonexistent in 17 centuries of historical orthodox true Christianity prior to the19th century. You got that right.
  17. C

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    If your claim is legitimate, you should have no problem at all providing independent confirmation. But you can't. Your claim is illegitimate.