Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. C

    The Root question of Amillenial vs Premillenial

    "Replacement theology" is certainly nonsense.
  2. C

    The Root question of Amillenial vs Premillenial

    The name is Origen. So if you've been reading Origin, then you haven't been reading Origen. But I think that WPM and rwb misspelled it as well. And the dialogue was between Justin Martyr and Trypho, not Origin and Tyrpho. You're welcome. :D Replacement theology does not replace Israel's...
  3. C

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    I've repeatedly emphasized with Scripture that they are one and the same New Covenant, so I have no idea why you refuse to recognize it.
  4. C

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    Cite any Scripture declaring that there are two New Covenants in His Blood.
  5. C

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    You keep relapsing to "future". Where in Matthew 26:28 is "future"?
  6. C

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    Do you think that Jesus was unaware of what Jeremiah had prophesied? I would take Jesus' Words the same way that I have no doubt His disciples took them. With receptivity, conviction, and gratitude for the New Covenant in His Blood.
  7. C

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    Have you read posts 351 and 362? Paul's declarations are diametrically opposed to yours. Either Paul is wrong, or you are wrong. I'll let you decide.
  8. C

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    Explain how Romans 11:26 could be talking about some plan other than God's One Plan of Salvation by Grace through Faith in Christ Alone. With Scripture.
  9. C

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    Thanks bro.
  10. C

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    As you agree, Jesus' Words in Matthew 26:28, speaking of His New Covenant, are unmistakably in the present tense. Yet you claim that Jeremiah 31:31, which is quoted virtually verbatim in Hebrews 8:8 speaking of the same New Covenant, is not in the present tense, even though preceded and...
  11. C

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    Paul has previously identified "all Israel" for us, saved by One Plan. Two Israels. Romans 9 6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: 7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy...
  12. C

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    Is His plan for Jews and Gentiles alike that they should receive His Son and His salvation, and be added to His Church? Ephesians 2:13-22 Or should Jews reject His Son and His salvation and His Church, because His plan for Jews is "completely separate and different"? Describe the plan that...
  13. C

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    You missed this: Matthew 26:28 Greek 1510 [e] estin ἐστιν is V-PIA-3S Present indicative active. No prophetic future there. Matthew 26 27 And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink ye all of it; 28 For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many...
  14. C

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    Matthew 26:28 Greek 1510 [e] estin ἐστιν is V-PIA-3S Present indicative active. No prophetic future there. Matthew 26 27 And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink ye all of it; 28 For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission...
  15. C

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    Not complicated in the least. Jesus is speaking of His New Covenant in the present tense. As would the writer of Hebrews 8 et al do subsequently. Fait accompli. Do you think that Jesus' Blood was simply a Jewish matter? And that it was shed for the remission of only Jewish sins?
  16. C

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    Matthew 26 28 For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins. Which of your four claimed covenants was in His Blood, shed for the remission of sins? Awaiting your answer.
  17. C

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    True. And Israel from its birth and throughout its history was comprised of both Jews and Gentiles. Genesis 17:12; Exodus 12:48-49; Leviticus 19:34; Leviticus 24:22 God was not and is not a racist. Nor can He be contorted into one.
  18. C

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    You seem to have missed something rather important. Matthew 26 28 For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins. Which of your four claimed covenants were in His Blood, shed for the remission of sins?
  19. C

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    Yes, I agree that the Church was in the OT within Israel. Acts 7:38. But the inauguration of the New Covenant at Calvary necessitated a New Covenant Church to carry its gospel message to the world. That Church was born at Pentecost.
  20. C

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    Hebrews 9 15 And for this cause he is the mediator of the new testament, that by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the first testament, they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance. 16 For where a testament is, there must also of...
Top Bottom