Search results

You've mistyped your question. As asked it is merely a thinly veiled insult to all Christians. What are some reasons followers of Christ hold on to issues of a person’s past? - That wording assumes ALL followers of Christ do what you accuse. It should be worded: What are reasons some...

Sound doctrine. I don't have to experience a crusifixion to know what it did for me theologically. But I do know what theological implications there are in the experience when I stand in a room full of men and women shaking and falling and burbling mindless blather, and those implications are...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angel_Moroni

Watch out Son of Man, she will start stalking you and try to get you banned on other websites. It is good to be persecuted for His sake and Lord knows the rabble here are expert at persecuting the Lord's loved messengers.

Ahhh, so you are Alabaster... thanks for the ban over at CB ;)

+1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=er9M22Hil9g

So now I am a liar, Satan, going to Hell, deceiver, etc... all because I disagree with a minor issue??? No wonder the skeptics look at what passes as Christian Scholarship and love and belly-laugh.

Accompany means to go along with... those who were travelling to deliver the word, those He was commanding at that time. It's clear, that passage is for those in the scene only.

Sorry, verse 14 says this: ..."and he rebuked them for their unbelief and hardness of heart..." Christ was addressing those whom He just rebuked and was telling only they would bear the power He granted them since they now believe because they could see Him.

It's funny that you claim context... let's look at the context of the Great Commission Passage you have clipped, in it's entirity. The context is quite clear, those gifts were given to those present with him, not every believer they encounter. The signs are accompanying those who are going...

A lot of this hangs on the definition of what a Spiritual Gift IS. I'll give you my working definition: A true Spiritual Gift (unique for the individual member of the Body of Christ) is a special gift to be used in edifying, uplifting, encouraging, enhancing, and furthering the Body of Christ...

I make the same claim against your position, merely the traditions of men in clinging to what was lost but will one day be returned.

Interesting read, but it addresses the position of Total Cessationism, which is a position, I agree, the Bible does not support. But the cessation of tongues, healing, and prophesy are addressed in scripture (Partial Cessationism), and that is where I dispute on the issue. Additionally, Total...

Defend scripture.

More ad hominem attacks... but to her post. All of those evidences listed are benefits IF tongues was extant, none of that goes to the question ARE they extant.

I've seen him lend credibility to Rick Warren... the enemy of my enemy is still my enemy.

So, another user, instead of engaging in discussion simply accuses me of being Satan (or unsaved or going to hell, etc). I wonder if there are any Christian Rationalists left in this world?

In preparing for this disputation I came across a very succinct and easy to read pre-prepared disputation and apology for Cessationism (the entire point of the discussion). I will reprint it here for your thoughtful consideration. The direct link appears below: >> LINK <<

For today's article on "This Just In!!!" we present research that suggests it's safer for the mom to murder her unborn child than it is to give birth to them. http://www.reuters.c...E80M2BS20120123 Here is a statistic they overlooked. It's 100% fatal for the child.