Search results

Doesn't matter. We are no longer under the law and that includes observance ofthe Sabbath day... Which is Saturday. It is wrong to claim the Sabbath is Sunday though ... Its not. But whatever day your Church meets... That is your holy day.

Whether or not Bede is canonized or not, I will default to you as I am not aan expert on Catholic Saints. However, I will point out that according to Wikipedia. Anonized as a Doctor of the Church in 1899. As for Nick Sayers... It kind of does matter who he is. You mention that Hislop is a...

So you are not going to answer any of my questions?

Again, who is he? What are his credentials? I've read his article. They cannot be considered facts fact. Only theory. What I notice is that Bede, Hislop and Grimm are citing a word origin completely different that Sayer and Woodrow. So what you are calling true facts is nothing more than...

Really? Where? Better read the whole verse and chapter. Really? I got it from the Bible, not Calvin. And I've read both. Have you? Only if he quoted the Bible.

Well I agree. Its stated in other places as well. Did he? Its been about 10 years since I read his works.... But that is what he was getting at. Yet he didn't always adhere to that. And he did contradict himself at times.... The style of writing he and others did (Martin as well) made it...

The whole topic of OSAS is difficult to tackle. First off, its accredited to an absolutely brilliant scholar named Calvin. Yet... He really isn't the author of TULIP. I can't remember if he mention the phrase osas, but he did espouse the concept in 3 hapters of one of his some 60 books. In...

Ēostre - Wikipedia No, I don't like quoting Wikipedia. I don't consider it a reliable source. But read the first few paragraphs and use it as a springboard for further study.

Well, I have a few problems wih this. First off... Who is Nicholas Sayers? I did a google search on him and no one popped up as any kind of historian. Not meaning to throw any shade on him.... But who is he that I should listen to him? Second, when you search on the origin of the word...

Well, maybe you should keep different company.

You might've ..... I didn't.

I was caught up in the I died and became the dead in Christ. That's the short answer. Here's the medium answer: The Lord descended and annointed a preacher (an angel... A messenger) to gibe me a powerful message that shook my way of thinking enough that it changed my mind (a shout). Now I...

Jesus return? He's here. He said he would not leave us. He said he dwells in us. Folks... I have been "raptured". For me the rapture happened 18 years ago.

It seems to me that common sense would come to a conclusion given the facts about the law: 1. Jesus, Paul and James (from the epistle of James) all concluded or made statements that note if you are guilty of one point of the law, you are guilty of breaking the whole law. 2. No one ever kept...

I belong to a non denominational Church. We look at the Bible as the writings and teachings of holy men of old moved upon by the holy spirit. It is God talking to us through men. We believe God still talks to us through men, but the Bible is the standard and foundation of our faith. Not...

I think he meant ye have not many fathers. No, I don't think he was using a hyperbole. In 1 Cor 4 Paul used a hyperbole, but Jesus didn't.

We should not address any Church leader as Father. That is what Jesus was saying. Its not that difficult to understand. Only ONE is your father. Yes, your biological dad is your father. That's fine. We have fore-fathers as did the Jews. That's fine. But in terms of spirituality...

I read this early and didn't respond. Now its 8 pages long and I don't have the patience to weed ot all out. Aspen, I am not going to ask you if tou believe you've received such. I can't even answer if I have received a personal revelation, but I suspect I have. I have never seen a 9 foot...

Well, I am not a yo yo. And I read chapter 8 and 9 before posting my comments. There is absolutely no indication that other apostles were present. Acts 11 pretty much says the other apostles weren't with him.

I didn't say that. In fact I said just the opposite. I just don't think it happened in Acts 2 or Acts 10. It may have happened in Acts 2. It definitely didn't happen in chapter 10 . Peter was the only apostle present. I do doubt he was speaking in tongues then. But I am confident that...