Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. C

    This will be a sign for you:

    Matthew 23 33 Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell? John 8 44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a...
  2. C

    This will be a sign for you:

    Unbelieving Israel is antichrist.
  3. C

    This will be a sign for you:

    Two Israels. Romans 9 6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: 7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. 8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh...
  4. C

    This will be a sign for you:

    He won't fight for antichrist. 1 John 2 22 Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. 23 Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also.
  5. C

    This will be a sign for you:

    Christ will not fight for antichrist. Of course. Why are you obsessed with antichrist? Antichrist wannabe?
  6. C

    This will be a sign for you:

    Christ will not fight for antichrist.
  7. C

    This will be a sign for you:

    True identity is found only in Christ. The unbelievers of Israel have no identity except that of Satan. The believers of Israel have true identity, that of Christ.
  8. C

    This will be a sign for you:

    Who wannabe antichrist? Only antichrist wannabe antichrist. :laughing:
  9. C

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    You can't understand. Luke provided the interpretive details for identifying and locating the abomination of desolation. Details which were unmistakably fulfilled by 70 AD. Not awaiting a delusional dispensational futurized fantasy and fallacy. The elect refers to the Judaean Christians. If...
  10. C

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    Matthew 24 15 When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand) Luke 21 20 And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh. Do you think...
  11. C

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    Some insights by Bro. Woodrow from Scripture and history. Ralph Woodrow, Great Prophecies of the Bible PERSECUTION AGAINST THE DISCIPLES Matthew: "Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated of all nations for my name's sake. And then shall many...
  12. C

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    Jerusalem was originally destroyed circa 589–587 BC. Seems you ignored that. It didn't cease being known as the holy city when it was rebuilt. So why do you think it ceased being the holy city before 70 AD? Jesus called the Roman armies the abomination of desolation. Whom to believe? 1. You...
  13. C

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    Luke's account interprets it in the parallel verse. Luke 21 20 And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh. We've already explained why Jesus meant Jerusalem. Luke's account confirms Him. A city is a place. If Jerusalem was a holy...
  14. C

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    Jesus was speaking of Jerusalem, known since OT times as the "holy city" (Nehemiah 11:1; Isaiah 52:1), and to the Roman armies advancing on it. Jesus did not mean the temple, for if the Jerusalem Christians had waited until the Roman armies reached the temple, any opportunity for their escape...
  15. C

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    Did the Judaean Christians literally flee? What impelled them to literally flee? And no, it had nothing to do with Antiochus. Luke identifies the AoD as the Roman armies. Antiochus was not a Roman, nor did he have Roman armies. Rome was his enemy. And learn to read. Nowhere have I claimed...
  16. C

    The Galilean wedding is the model for the pre-trib rapture

    So let's see 'em. Names, dates, sources, and verbatim quotes including surrounding contexts.
  17. C

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    The Judaean Christians had no problems being literal. They understood Jesus' warnings literally, heeded them literally, fled literally, and survived literally. They were literally correct. Luke's accounts affirm their literal understandings and literal actions.
  18. C

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    Where does the Olivet discourse mention animal sacrificing?
  19. C

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    The only preposterous ones are those who refuse to recognize that the Holy Spirit inspired Luke 21:20 to be the synoptic interpretation identifying the AOD. Which was the abominable Roman armies bringing desolation upon Jerusalem and Judaea.
  20. C

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    There is only one Individual identified as a prince in the passage. He is Messiah the Prince. Daniel 9:25 He was the prince who did come. Daniel 9:26