Search results

That is exact opposite of what Peter said. Now, here is what Peter REALLY said... 38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. Funny how you cannot post the...

Amen.

You said baptism is not salvational. Peter said it is for the remission of sins. Therefore you teach remission of sins is not salvational. You get an F on the scripture test today.

Acts 2:38 was after Christ ascended. Acts 2:38 is before Acts 3. In Acts 2:38 a precedent was set by God via Peter. All following verses refer to salvation per Acts 2:38, and do not debunk it. Very clever pitting latter verses against it. Excellent debunking technique when one wants to...

Because you do not want the name of Jesus Christ spoken over you by anyone as you are baptized for the remission of your sins, nor for anyone else. This is the last thing most Christians would want to experience. They like "short cuts" to God.

What exactly would you have told the 3000 at Pentecost? Quote it. If you cannot quote it, you have a problem with it.

They teach to baptize unregenerated infants. They teach the name of the son is 'son". Nope. You skip Acts 2:38 altogether and save folks by their OWN faith....Self salvation.

Acts 2:38 is the only way to be saved since it's inception.

What would you have told the 3000 at Pentecost if you were Peter? Exactly what Peter said in verse 38 or something different? Please elaborate, thanks.

The bulk of Christianity ignores it entirely. They wish Acts 2:38 and it's adherents would go away and never return. They are the daughters of the RCC.

Acts 2:38(Jesus' spoken name) is magic? Black magic or white magic?

To get into Christ his actual name must be spoken upon baptism. I would not marry a bride that would not take my name. The bride of Christ is baptized in the specific name(Jesus) of the groom.

No Dan, the 3000 asked Peter, "what shall we do"? Peter tells them to obey per Acts 2:38. You say, "nothing, because Jesus did it all". Shame on you, Dan. You distort scripture to attempt to debunk Peter. The litmus test to see if you are anti-Acts 2:38 in this question..... If you were...

Amen. It is the fulfillment of the tabernacle as we follow Jesus to Acts 2:38. The priest kills the bull etc....Jesus dies....we die(repent). The priest washed at the laver...Jesus was baptized to fulfill all righteousness....we wash our sins away(baptism in the name of Jesus Christ for the...

The spoken name of Jesus Christ in the water remits sins per Acts 2:38. God honors such symbolism. Just like the priest in the tabernacle. God honored it sooo much, that the priest would die if he skipped the brazen laver(representing water baptism).

Yes, the 1st Adam got us into this mess, so another Adam got us out of this mess.

You skipped Acts 2:38 again, Dan. You reject Peter's command. You are not of the 3000 at Pentecost. What church does that leave you in?

Obeying Peter in Acts 2:38 was a ritual for the 3000 at Pentecost?

They will not even acknowledge Acts 2:38. They nearly hate it. They fight it tooth and nail like Covid 19. They are inoculated from it by the seminary.

Acts 2:38 is before Acts 3. You skipped Acts 2:38. Very naughty.