Search results

I think the book of Daniel has been opened up to this generation. Another consideration should be that since we don't know what the seven thunders said but they are within the timing of Rev. they could throw all our theories out the window.

Hi Taken, how do you select a quote from who you're responding to w/o carrying over the whole thing. I've tried copying but then it doesn't have the box where it says, so and so said...?

Seeing as how God is omni-present, He can't NOT be here.

While I agree it is important to be ready to go, I feel it is just as important to be ready to stay. Regardless of one's end times beliefs until they're history, they are all only possibilities, speculations and assumptions about our understanding of prophecy. Nothing is guaranteed accept the...

Still working on that revision but I've been sick lately, but I will get back to it.

Speaking of the north who you say were divorced (which was past tense, btw) (even if that we're true that doesn't mean there couldn't be reconciliation) however, Jer. 3:11-14 - "And the Lord said unto me, The backsliding Israel hath justified herself more than treacherous Judah. 12 Go and...

I would say read the rest of the chapter from vss. 11-18. The bill of divorce is no more.

I'll get back to you on that. I'm doing a little revision and secondary speculation.

yes

Corel, Your quote, "The sun and the moon did not exist in Genesis 1." Really??? Have you read Gen. 1 lately? Vs. 16 is a clue.

Symbolism is a slippery slope that leads to false theologies. In Rev. Whenever obvious symbolism is used, it is explained somewhere within the text. If you can't find an obvious answer, it's literal not symbolism and in Rev. 12 there are obvious clues that lead to Israel, imo.

Windmill, your question - "Would you please explain how this is relevant to what you quoted from my post." H3117 - Day - literal=as you say, figuratively - age, always, continually, everlasting. Where do you see that there is no possibility of long lengths of time? I would consider the minimum...

Hi Corel, First, I agree with your view on Rev. 12. Isaiah 45:18 New International Version (NIV) 18 For this is what the Lord says—he who created the heavens,he is God;he who fashioned and made the earth,he founded it;he did not create it to be empty,but formed it to be inhabited—he says:“I am...

Corel, First, I went through all 29 posts and there was no Isaiah verse offered. "Debris of war", that's a new one. When God created the universe, He set things in motion, time took care of everything else. What we may consider random events in the universe probably have a reason and purpose...

We have no idea when or where this battle took place. Presuming it was upon the earth is a giant leap of guesswork. How is that different from my opinion piece, which at least has a more realistic flow of logic, imo?

Windmill said..."He said that man was from the beginning of creation, that is there was no evolution, no long periods of time unless of course he lied." It's all dealing with context. The simple fact is of all the hundreds of prophecies that speak of "that" day is speaking of a day sometime in...

This may sound weird but I've always thought that Rev. 9:9-10 sounds a lot like helicopters with rear firing "stinger" chem-based missiles. How else would someone of John's era describe them?

Brothers no, a cousin 10,000 times or more removed, Yes. If you don't look at it that way then everyone is committing incest.

I'm not saying they aren't or they don't, Coral, just that what pre-trib breaks down what the 70th week consists of is not accurately based on scripture. Yes, it can be broken down into a sequential series of events, just not the way pre-trib believes. BTW, I was pre-trib for 40 yrs. and could...

Angels can not create.