Search results

As you do unto others... And since I stated plainly that we follow the Son and the Father where they lead you cannot convince that we follow any cult teaching. There is no accurate bible translation. Understanding of God's intent comes through the Holy Spirit since even the Jews entrusted with...

Apparently he has never sought out the meanings of the signs used in Strong's and the meanings of their usage. 120 'adam aw-dawm' from 119; ruddy i.e. a human being (an individual or the species, mankind, etc.) :--X another, + hypocrite, + common sort, X low, man (mean, of low degree), person...

Some of the people you allude to here have no ties to any cult nor the error inherent to them. We have chosen to follow the Son of God and the Father of all living where they lead and not as the traditions of men would try to take us. Some like myself are ardent students of ancient Hebrew and we...

In Gen 2:4 The word construction translated "in the day" is beyôm which is a specialized use of yom and in this case means "when" or "at the time when" and not "in the day". Thus, Gen 2:4 should read ".....at the time when the Lord God made the earth and heaven" This same word usage can be...

Indeed you are quite correct. The Son is not the Father nor is the Son part of some Trinitarian mystery. The Father or uncaused cause has always existed and the Son was the first born of the Father and as such the Son is an effect caused by the uncaused cause. For God has stated that it is not...

ummm No it doesn't. It states the God made the heavens and the earth in the time period defined as the beginning and there is no reference anywhere that the terminology of the beginning is equivalent to a day. Here is a mechanical translation of Genesis 1:1 and 1:2 בְּרֵאשִׁית בָּרָּא...

How many of us are fathers or mothers? And how many have had both boys and girls to bring up? Remember the time of the children's early years when boys were gross and girls were icky? During this time in our kids lives we had no worries about any sexual problems occurring from their end of the...

Seriously... I have not recovered from your last one

These are those people who submit to the lusts of the body / passions of the flesh. These desires of the body which are defined in various places in the bible have been described as sexual immorality, impurity, passion, evil desire, and covetousness etc. etc. So if your spirit freely chooses to...

So lets see.... your message to others is that since sinning is the nature of your flesh then we should just let the flesh keep doing what it wants with no exertion of control by you to keep it from doing that. Sounds like a hall pass to me. also sounds exactly like lawlessness unless of course...

Paul is preaching that he is putting into subjection all that he has control over. God is not going to do it for you and he will not make a voluntary sinner righteous. What you submit yourself too is what identifies your master. You say that Paul preached Jesus Christ but what did Christ...

Those who assert that it is impossible are essentially denying that Christ came in the flesh. Christ's mission was to be our example in that he "A MAN" was able to attain perfection while existing in a body of flesh because he had God as his helper in the same manner as we can have the HS as our...

Well it was not intended as a trick question. The question is intended to get others to really assess what may not be correctly comprehended upon initial reading. Your initial assessment is that "the carnal mind can't be subject because it "rejects" the law of God. It is common for a man to...

We all grasp what it means to be in subjection but you have not answered the question.... Why 'CAN'T' the "mind of the flesh" be subject to the law of God? To be able to answer this question one must first be able to define what the "mind of the flesh" is in the first place.

Now I wonder how many understand exactly why the "mind of the flesh" cannot be subject to the law of God.

101G is trying to make the scripture assert that Eve was simply another man and not part of the original image of God defined by Adam and Eve together but no worries.

I am slain.... I give..... You have killed me again.... There will be a report of your heinous acts on the next angel out.

ummmm no! There will be quite a bit of traffic going through the wide gate and I am quite sure that they will not be forgiven. The proper way to state what Christ did was to become the final sacrifice for those who "WOULD BE" saved. And I would also point out that the Father loved the "world"...

Yes that would be commonly understood by most people. No it won't. This is where you do the Pharisee thing and add something which is not in the text and attempt to pass it off as real. Show me the scripture that confirms what you are saying. Remember the Sabbath existed prior to any covenant...

Richard, this one would argue with God himself. I gave it a shot before... so, my conscience is clear... it's in Gods hands now from my POV. As you will see there is not much in the way of constructive discourse... it is simply i'm right your wrong deal with it.