Search results

Hey Amigo, So if I adhere to YOUR interpretation of Scripture and adhere to YOUR doctrine that will show that I am listening and you won't be depressed/sad anymore? If I listen to YOU I will be saved? Is that what you are saying? Curious Mary

You are absolutely right amigo. You never said James was the decision maker. I put words in your mouth and I shouldn't have done that. What you said was that James reminded them about what Peter had said in vs 10. And, you are right in that they all had a voice. Even though you didn't say that...

Lol...got it. You don't trust the interpretation of other men...well, except the man inside your head. You trust that man. You rule over you and you are watching over your soul and you will give account for what you decide is the truth. You submit to you. You take heed of what you teach...

I know. You only need yourself to consult with! The only important biblical commentary is the commentary YOU produce. F A S C I N A T I N G!!!

Sooooo you don't deny the universal authority of the Pope AND you don't think that the Bible is the only source of revealed truth? You believe what The Church teaches in that the magisterium reveals the truth of Scripture? Welcome to The Church started by Christ with Peter as it's first 'pope'...

How have your men interpreted this: whoever eats this bread or drinks this cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. 28 But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of the bread and drink of the cup. 29 For he who eats and drinks in an unworthy...

Hey Rene, You are being bashed because the Salve Regina is to Catholic like. You are on a Protestant forum that doesn't praise the Mother of God like He did. Mary

got it....you are dodging the question and refusing to answer it because you know it destroys what you have taught yourself when it comes to how to eat His body and drink His blood. Well, the NT Christians could answer. You can't. :( I can answer Paul's rhetorical question: :rolleyes: Yes...

Oh, I see now Daniel. YOU read Scripture and when YOU decide you have properly interpreted into the Truth YOU believe that the Messiah has guided you to that truth....fascinating. Sooooo why is your truth different than other men's truth who also claim the Messiah is guiding them into the truth...

Oh goodness...No, reading the word is not the same as eating the Truth. How did Christians read the Gospel when it wasn't written until several years after He died? There was not Scripture to read kiddo.

LOL....Why do you keep alluding to "priest" and baptism? You do know that your Protestant brothers also baptize babies and they aren't priest. Or do you want to ignore that fact that your teaching is opposite of what Christianity has taught for 2,000 years which includes your 500 year old...

hey Joshu, Using your logic that the bible doesn't say to baptize: where in Scripture does it say how old one has to be to get baptized? Since it's not in Scripture how old one has to be so how do you KNOW that we shouldn't baptize babies? Scripture says that entire families were baptized...

Oh goodness... :( What man taught you that reading Scripture is the same as eating Scripture? I have heard this bizarre teaching before and have asked others who started this teaching, but no one can answer me. :( Also, you do know that those passages that you quoted have absolutely NOTHING to...

You crack me up Truther. What you bloviated about was and is not an "historical observation". It is YOU putting together what YOU think Scripture says and then YOU take Christian history and then twist both Scripture AND Christian history into what YOU believe. Unless you can come up with same...

Hey Daniel, How do you fulfill John 6:54? Curious Mary

Good morning truther, Soooo if I find somebody that has taught themselves for 50 years, they would have 7 more years of "observation" than you. Should I believe them over you if they teach something opposite of you? After all, they have 7 more years of "observation" than you sooooo obviously...

Where does Scripture say that?

Hi Illuminator, @amigo de christo doesn't see how he is refuting (contradicting) himself. On one hand amigo is agreeing that James deferred (he uses the word reminding) to what Peter said in vs10 but on the other hand he is saying that James made the decision. What I don't understand how he...

Hmmm......so according to what your men have taught you James was just "reminding them" of the rhetorical question that Peter asked them in vs 10? That rhetorical question had absolutely no influence on their decision? Fascinating..... You are seeing too much into what your men have taught you...

Fascinating....what man taught you that?