Search results

Daniel 2:21 affirms my post. Thanks for quoting it. The ECFs knew who he would be. They were correct. The ECFs knew that pagan Rome withheld the man of sin. They were correct. Copy/paste verbatim my quote calling Christians pagan Romans. :D

Daniel 9 27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week This Christ did, for the first 3 1/2 years through His own ministry to Israel, and, after His return to Heaven, for the second 3 1/2 years through the ministry of His disciples to Israel. 3 1/2 years + 3 1/2 years = 7 years...

It certainly was my point. Brakelite got it. You didn't, even though you quoted Daniel 2:21 which affirms it. God did not permit the removal of the kingdom of pagan Rome before His time. Scripturally obvious. As ECF Lactantius said, "Beseech the God of heaven that the Roman State might be...

God used the armies of pagan Rome to destroy Jerusalem in 70 AD. There is no reason why He similarly did not subsequently use pagan Rome to delay the emergence of papal Rome. Your Satan was in reality God. Bad for you; good for Him. :D

What do you think that is describing?

Where in Scripture is that?

What if his mother is a Gentile convert to Babylonian talmudism? :D There's no such thing as "Judaism".

And yours. :)

It's in Scripture (Hebrews 9:15-17). Thus it's relevant. Prophesied in the OT, fulfilled in the NT (Hebrews 8:6-13).

Do you consider a Better Covenant established upon Better Promises (Hebrews 8:6), to be moving the goal posts?

Why not? Don't you agree with him? You're twisting your own words. Rome was the entity holding back the antichrist of the apostate papacy, as the ECFs recognized. Explain why that was bad.

Paul said, "For the mystery of iniquity doth already work". You said, "Paul knew that the Holy Spirit was already at work." Why didn't you quote what Paul said, instead of substituting what you said? Please provide a verbatim quote of anyone other than yourself who has characterized Rome as...

See post 20. They cannot remain in force and effect, because they have been transcended and replaced by the promissory clauses of the New Testamentary Will, which came into full force and effect upon the death of Christ. It is Christ Himself who is the fulfillment of all of the OT promises and...

What is true is that the old testamentary will has been replaced by the New Testamentary Will, which declares: 2 Corinthians 1 20 For all the promises of God in him are yea, and in him Amen, unto the glory of God by us. Galatians 3 16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He...

ful·fill [fo͝olˈfil] verb fulfil (verb) · fulfils (third person present) · fulfilled (past tense) · fulfilled (past participle) · fulfilling (present participle) · fulfill (verb) · fulfills (third person present) bring to completion or reality; achieve or realize (something desired, promised...

The New Covenant is uniquely also the New Testament i.e. testamentary will. It required, and came into full force and effect upon, the death of Christ its Testator. Neither the US Constitution nor any of the other aforementioned covenants are testamentary wills. Hebrews 9 15 And for this...

A covenant does not exist until both parties agree to its terms and conditions. That which does not exist is neither confirmed nor valid.

So you are going with your own opinion over God's Word then? Speculation is for Jesuit futurites. Historical fulfillment doesn't speculate. Paul said, "For the mystery of iniquity doth already work". He wasn't referring to the Holy Spirit. :laughing:

Ask GISMYS_7 what he was claiming. Don't ask me. Jesus is the Christ. So is He, or is He not, a Christian?

There is not one recognized expositor of the true Christian Church prior to the 19th century who denies the full and perfect fulfillment of Daniel 9:24 by Christ at Calvary. You're an alien voice in denial of Christ's accomplishments at Calvary.