Search results

Of course you didn't quote it, because it spiritually interprets and affirms the Scripture in Matthew, and simultaneously detonates your own carnalized private interpretation. Who/What interprets Scripture? 1. You 2. Scripture Need a hint? :laughing:

Thanks for failing to contort God into a racist.

Thanks for confirming the Scripture that I quoted. :)

If you see that I'm telling you that God cannot be contorted into a racist, then you do see.

Another delusionist. Revelation 7 4 And I heard the number of them which were sealed: and there were sealed an hundred and forty and four thousand of all the tribes of the children of Israel. That includes Gentiles. Genesis 17:12; Exodus 12:48-49; Leviticus 19:34; Leviticus 24:22 Or have you...

They certainly are not "from Jacob". They are explicitly identified as "not of thy seed" and "strangers" to distinguish them from those who are "from Jacob". They are Gentiles who were received as children of Israel, when in faith and obedience they believed God and conformed to His Covenant...

Correct. Those of Genesis 17:12; Exodus 12:48-49; Leviticus 19:34; Leviticus 24:22 are also Israelites, even though not the physical offspring of Abraham/Isaac/Jacob. They are Gentile Israelites. God is not a racist.

Yes, the Pharisees didn't hate Jesus. They only killed Him.

You brought up the absurd delusional fantasy of "natural born offspring of Jacob, not the billions of others who have mixed blood". There are no such animals. :laughing: Quintessential pharisaic dispensational racism. So now you claim that the offspring of Jacob are not Jews. So they must be...

Your memory is as bad as your dogma. :laughing:

The only garbage and nonsense is that of a fantasy nonexistent pureblooded "natural born offspring of Jacob".

Romans 2 28 For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: 29 But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God. Paul identifies...

How are the pureblooded "natural born offspring of Jacob" recognized? Easily. By the profusion of two- and three- headed degenerative mutations resulting from exclusively incestuous inbreeding. :laughing: Can be confirmed with a DNA spit kit, which I presume you carry continuously...

They have everything to do with the past four millennia, because they are the Church "throughout all ages, world without end. Amen." Ephesians 3:21 Too bad you've missed it. :laughing:

Does Christ believe in Himself? Is He part of His Body and Bride – His Church?

The Church and the 144,000 Revelation 7:3-4 describe the 144,000 as “sealed.” That description is reserved in the NT for believers in Christ – His Body and Bride – His Church: 2 Corinthians 1:21-22 Now He who establishes us with you in Christ and anointed us is God, who also sealed us and gave...

I explained why the original 12 were all Jews. What don't you understand? Contrary to Genesis 17:12; Exodus 12:48-49; Leviticus 19:34; Leviticus 24:22; you claim that the 12 tribes were exclusively Jews.

I have no idea what you're babbling about. Neither do you. :laughing: The gospel went first to the Jews. Romans 1:16; Acts 3:25-26; Acts 13:46 Satisfied? Nah.

Jesus ministered to Gentiles (Matthew 8:28-34; Matthew 15:21-28). Nothing racist about that. God deliberately excluding faithful obedient Gentiles from the 144K would be racist. There would be no defensible reason for Him to do so.

They were Jews, because the primary focus of the 3.5 years of Jesus' ministry and the following 3.5 years of His disciples' ministry, was the Jews. (Romans 1:16; Acts 3:25-26; Acts 13:46) Luke, who became a later disciple and NT author, was a Gentile.