Search results

Babies need not repent, nor are they full of sin. Were you a sinner baby that needed repentance and baptism in Jesus name for the remission of your sins? Were you Rosemary's baby or something?

The authority comes exclusively by speaking the name of Jesus Christ. The Apostles had no personal power, but as they spoke the name(Jesus) of the God inside them that had all power, the God inside them did the remitting of sins per water baptism, also signs and wonders.

I have an adult daughter who was Baptized when she was less than a month old - because Acts 2:39 said that the promise of the Holy Spirit was for HER as well. STUDY your Bible, dudue . . . You adult daughter is your child and will never cease to be your child. Correct?

You have me crossed with someone else. I insist on water baptism in the name of Jesus Christ exclusively FOR the remission of sins.

Huh?

Don't show me, show Peter and Paul. They were the ones that advocated baptism "in the name of Jesus Christ", specifically. Debunk them, not me. I just follow their words. Oh, I see, you have been debunking them for decades. My bad.

I have 2 children that are 31 and 33 years old. How old are your children?

The Bible is an idiotic house of cards? I looked there to no avail. Shame on you for calling it that. It also does not say the disciples preached to dogs and cats, though Jesus said to preach to every creature. Oh, no. I gave the RCC a new doctrine.

We can rebuke devils in Jesus name but not baptize them in Jesus name? Isn't water baptism in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins both word and deed? The reason you "dunk your wet sinners" is because you are forbidden to say in the name of Jesus Christ, causing the remission of...

You are spot on. Anti-baptism modernists are infesting Christendom at an alarming pace. Satan want nobody to obtain remission of sins per water baptism in the name of Jesus Christ. Also, Satan want nothing else done in word or deed in the name of Jesus Christ. Satan trembles as much as...

Do you cast out devils saying, in the name of Jesus Christ or just think them out?

I see how the RCC get's their infant baptism doctrine...by looking for folks that have NOT been mentioned in the Bible. That is their pattern...extra Biblical commentary doctrines. Slick!

You forgot to ask me if I can give you an example of a man with no eyes, no arms, no legs and no hair getting baptized in he N.T.(you are not on your game today, sunshine). So, you turned Acts 2:38 into this.... 38 Then Peter said unto the PARENTS, Repent FOR YOUR BABIES, and BAPTIZE every one...

I see. You go to a drunk wallowing in the gutter and ask him, do you believe? He says "hiccup, why sure I do". You got a modern, un-repented born again convert to Christ. Congratulations. That archaic Acts 2:38 is for the birds anyway, right?

The name of Jesus Christ is given to us to use in word or deed. Try it sometime, instead of judging who is worthy or not.

I deny anyone salvation that rejects Acts 2:38. I will obey God rather than man.

LOL

No, you are saying Jesus said "unless you break your mama's water and get the Holy Ghost you can't be saved". That is a ridiculous thing to say Jesus meant.

If it is not limited, why are the deaf, blind, etc, still among us. Why does Paul say we know, prophecy etc in part, then it will be done away? Why does he say we only see through a dark glass? Is this the best that God can do now, or will Jesus' return heal everyone and end the partial gifts?

I did not say that. The church as we know it made NO covenant with God. The covenant was a promise to Abraham about his future physical descendants being saved at the return of Christ en masse(every single living one of them simultaneously). That has not happened yet. So far all that has...