Search results

That's true but only partially (but i agree with those who are milking the cow) A large reality is that the scamdemic has done severe damage to businesses as a whole and the entire supply chain so many jobs simply no longer are or are severely curtailed. Those people cant help that. The...

And thats fine because there's no "mandate" to pray- however there is strong "encouragement" to do so. You need to explain that "prayer" is a medium of communication that while unnecessary as a matter of fact (God is Sovereign and already does know- thats a fact) it is encouraged and desired as...

I remember a story about 2 weeks to flatten a curve

The Spanish Flu was not a biological agent launched as a deliberate attack supported by political entities with the purpose of global domination.

I don't believe it can or ever will now.

I'm not the one you need to tell that too. More evidence of "rules for thee" and that there is more to this false flag operation than the elite want us to know.

unless its a birthday bash for former Presidents, riots or other "mostly peaceful" events

Very well and thats very logical- we do need to establish "god" ( garden variety deity with the little g) is in fact "God" (YHWH) or it wouldn't matter if Jesus or George was his son or he was born in a brothel. I'll start a post on that for ease of read and following. Scripture does not go...

No, "we" didn't OK, Look forward to it

Is there a point to this waffling or is this a standard word salad smoke screen to avoid addressing the aforementioned points? That's meaningless bantering. Which in this case on the points presented has been done with almost surgical strike accuracy. Even barney has picked up on it in the...

I think we can move forward now. We are in agreement that there is in fact God and a legitimate case can be made for it in science. If you agree, the next sequential step is establishing that His Son is Jesus. If you concur, lets start with your thoughts on that concept.

What you have submitted is best referred to as The A Priori Argument fallacy. Its not even a very strong one at that so will take just a few seconds to obliterate. First- if your premise 3 is correct then you cannot possibly state premise 1 & 2 as a fact to form the basis of your position. (...

That's nonsensical even for you but when you have less than nothing to hide behind I guess anything will do. Your entire statement is non sequitur and isn't even a good straw man. The discussion was on objectivity of world views and your agenda. ( which has been proven based on your own points...

I wasn't referring to just getting a license. I mean rewriting your Constitution. Granted it wont be easy but look at your alternative.

Thank you very much for the opportunity to once again factually rebuke you. That is very gracious indeed. I have never made any such claim and i respectfully challenge you to establish the basis of such an unfounded statement and provide strict proof and posts to support the validity of such a...

That's a given No, thats just a short list of excuses you hide behind. I have no problem re-posting half dozen or so recent ones you can specifically point out those claims you are trying pretend are true and run from them yet again. Say the word and it will happen. I see clearly and realize...

It was an actual question. You hide so much and evade direct questions then often answer with gibberish that its hard to get your true meaning

ok, you didnt put his quotes in there so i didnt catch it

Why are you quoting me? I didn't make the claim.(nor do I agree with it)

Is that what you are hiding behind now?