Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. D

    In the book of Revelation it mentions 'a little season' twice.

    Here's an idea then since deception obviously started in the beginning with satan and Eve. Before Eve was deceived, let's liken that to the millennium, since both accounts would be involving no one being deceived by satan during it. Unless of course one is an Amil, since that view does indeed...
  2. D

    In the book of Revelation it mentions 'a little season' twice.

    IOW, you are speaking for all Amils, despite Amils per post #3 and post #8 that it is not obvious to them? BTW, guess what that means you are doing to these Amils? You are misrepresenting their view. That adds up to that you are misrepresenting Amil in this case. LOL, the irony. Oh, that's...
  3. D

    In the book of Revelation it mentions 'a little season' twice.

    There are even some Amils in here insisting they are not the same little season. Where is your beef with them? Post #3, Post #8, for example. Why are you not saying to them what you are saying to Premils, meaning this--"Its obvious" because it cuts across your theology"
  4. D

    In the book of Revelation it mentions 'a little season' twice.

    Is it going to be like that forever? If no, what event or events is it, that prevents it from continuing forever in that manner?
  5. D

    In the book of Revelation it mentions 'a little season' twice.

    Premils, unlike Amils, in this case, try and determine some of these things based on what Revelation 20:4 records, then comparing that with what Revelation 13 records, for instance. One thing Revelation 20:4 records is this---which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had...
  6. D

    In the book of Revelation it mentions 'a little season' twice.

    Which would have to logically mean that his binding is during when he still has access to heaven before he is cast out into the earth. After all, it makes zero sense that he would be having great wrath while depicted locked up in the pit, right? his great wrath has be during a time when he is...
  7. D

    Interesting preterist argument

    It's not entirely clear to me by what you submitted, that if you agree Noah's flood = tribulation, or that you disagree it does? The way I tend to try and view a time of trouble is in this manner. It involves conflicts between nations, for one. For example, WW1, WW2. Those are examples of...
  8. D

    In the book of Revelation it mentions 'a little season' twice.

    You are being unfair here or you have reading comprehension. I did not use chagpt to do any of my thinking for me here. I used it in order to reframe what I said so that what I said might be easier for some to follow, since I don't exactly claim I have stellar writing skills. Granted, some in...
  9. D

    In the book of Revelation it mentions 'a little season' twice.

    Except, IMO, that is not the manner in which these things are being applied in Revelation 6:11 and Revelation 20. A little season is meaning it's duration once the little season begins. In the meantime this little season in both accounts are irrelevant since they only matter once they begin. For...
  10. D

    Interesting preterist argument

    Noah's flood does not qualify as tribulation, so why are some still arguing it does? Look what Jesus said in Matthew 24 in regards to the days of Noah leading up to the flood---For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage...
  11. D

    In the book of Revelation it mentions 'a little season' twice.

    I typed up a response, but instead of posting it first, I gave it to chatgpt to polish up, so to speak, thus the following. Still my thoughts, still my answers, just not framed in the same way it initially was. ----------------------------- chatgpt: Refinement of Your Reply (Polished Tone) I...
  12. D

    In the book of Revelation it mentions 'a little season' twice.

    Trust me, though I might disagree, I get where you are coming from here. But there are some hurdles you have to get over first that make your view come across as unlikely in the meantime. For one if a little season per A) can equal a lengthy time, a thousand years, actually 2000 years and...
  13. D

    HIDDEN IN PLAIN SIGHT: Why I believe this about the timing of the NHNE

    IOW, let's just contradict everything John told us in Revelation 20 and what the logical conclusion would be based on what he told us. First he told us this. Revelation 20:3 And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no...
  14. D

    HIDDEN IN PLAIN SIGHT: Why I believe this about the timing of the NHNE

    I'm not even an Amil, and even I understand the logic in Amil. If the thousand years began at the cross or soon after, when the thousand years end then, whenever that might be, that unless Christ has returned at the end of it, this indicates that we are still in this present age in the meantime...
  15. D

    In the book of Revelation it mentions 'a little season' twice.

    A) Revelation 6:11 And white robes were given unto every one of them; and it was said unto them, that they should rest yet for a little season, until their fellowservants also and their brethren, that should be killed as they were, should be fulfilled. B) Revelation 20:3 And cast him into the...
  16. D

    Interesting preterist argument

    Obviously, the last hour is not meaning a literal 60 minutes. I'm certain you obviously agree with that. Therefore, I'm not trying to insult your intelligence by telling you something you don't already obviously know. I said it in order to lead up to my points that follow. That it means the last...
  17. D

    Interesting preterist argument

    Let me lay something out for you to consider, though I suspect your doctrinal bias may make it difficult to fully engage with what I’m trying to show here---especially since you're not even a Preterist, yet agree with them that Matthew 24:21 is meaning 70 AD. My concern is with your...
  18. D

    HIDDEN IN PLAIN SIGHT: Why I believe this about the timing of the NHNE

    All I know is, I don't dislike Catholics. I have had numerous Catholic friends over the years. It's their religion I don't care for and I don't see it being reasonable that a saint, such as Justin Martyr was deceived about the millennium the entire time, but that Catholics who pray to departed...
  19. D

    HIDDEN IN PLAIN SIGHT: Why I believe this about the timing of the NHNE

    Have I been assuming some wrong things about you this entire time? Compared to @Spiritual Israelite, even though you and I might not agree about everything, you at least appear to understand where I am coming from and why, where @Spiritual Israelite typically doesn't a lot of the time. Thus why...
  20. D

    Interesting preterist argument

    Since I noticed you mentioned me here, I already wrote up something to try and address your post with here. But before I submit that, I need to be reminded what EXACTLY is your definition of Noah's flood? Does it qualify as tribulation, for example, in the same manner Matthew 24:21 qualifies as...