Search results

You are picking the definition of loss that suits your understanding's needs. The word loss can also mean incur damage, which is exactly what Jesus warned against in this parable: ​Now he told a parable to those who had been invited [when he] noticed how they were choosing for themselves the...

Salvation is guaranteed by the blood of the lamb. Salvation is only actualized when we put on corruption. The difference being that if we think salvation isn't guaranteed we will try to work to earn it. But if we know salvation is a guaranteed deposit we have already received, we will rest in...

Jesus makes whole; your analogy pertains only to the world. Your interpretation makes a mockery of salvation. Wandering in shame and darkness defines hell, not salvation. Any works of ours that are wood, hay and stubble will be consumed into nothing at the judgment seat of Christ. That includes...

This is an outstanding point.

What in GOD's name does this mean? Surely you are not suggesting that wandering in shame and darkness forever is salvation. Surely not.

Meshak, Jesus can be GOD without being part of a three-person trinity.

Uh-oh! There's that kinky threesome marriage thing again. GOD does have a body; it's name is Jesus. The things you mentioned sound like madness to a carnal mind that can't see beyond three dimensions. Just simply accept the witness of the spirit through scripture and the picture it draws. Stop...

Where in scripture does it teach that a marriage is between three (3) persons? (hmmm... this is starting to get kind of kinky)

Again, just like Zechariah 14:4, the Hebrew of Isaiah 13:9 says A day (יום) of the lord, not THE day (היום) of the lord. - http://www.christianityboard.com/topic/17608-chapter-14/#entry188611

EN means in, EIS means into. Ephesians 5:26 literally says: that he should be making her holy, cleansing it by the bath of the water in word.

Jesus is the Potentate, King of kings, and Lord of lords, not the father. The father is the light which no man can approach unto; whom no man hath seen, nor can see, except Jesus.

Again, just like Zechariah 14:4, the Hebrew of Isaiah 13:9 says A day (יום) of the lord, not THE day (היום) of the lord. The connection you are trying to make is a fantasy of your mind and falsehood because scripture doesn't corroborate your witness. "So who are you going to listen to...

I saw something today that I have never seen before. I was reading something on Michael Blume's website (http://mikeblume.com/clouds70.htm) about Matthew 26:64 But Jesus held his peace. And the high priest answered and said unto him, I adjure thee by the living God, that thou tell us whether...

+1

A day of the lord in Zechariah 14:1, not THE day of the lord - http://www.christianityboard.com/topic/17608-chapter-14/#entry188535

You obviously are not a careful student of scripture, because if you were you would know that the Hebrew behind the KJV doesn't say THE day of the lord, but A day of the lord. The definite article THE is missing from Zechariah 14:1 in the Hebrew text, as it is in numerous other places in the OT...

I don't, but since I have seen a lot of that in the Christian world there must be a lot of people who do.

It makes perfect sense when you realize Jesus is the visible lord ruling from the invisible father's right hand of power. Can you show me anywhere in scripture where the father has a body? A person by definition must have a body. And have you never talked with yourself?

Oh no! Hang on! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ki388VMPrYk

I believe Jesus is lord, yet I don't believe GOD is 3 persons. What sayest thou now? I believe Jesus is GOD, but I don't believe GOD is 3 persons.