Search results

YHWH outlined those creatures in Leviticus.

Yep; but once you get outside of the biased religious sources; and look at secular lexicography, of the every day spoken language; then all of a sudden there is harmony in the scripture.

(CLV) Lv 11:21 Only this one you may eat of every swarmer of the flyers, the one going on all fours which has shanks above its feet to hop with them on the land. (CLV) Lv 11:22 These of them may you eat: the locust, all of its kind, the bald locust, all of its kind, the cricket, all of its...

You're left without a credible source; and you claim that I'm defeated? LOL! I must say that you're, if nothing else, spirited; but the empirical evidence, and the readers' discernments, will determine who has been defeated. Strong not only believed works-based heresy that directly denies the...

The question related to what the verse meant. I put the verse into context with the preceding verse. The you said I was wrong. Your argument is not with me. Your argument is with Paul. Paul is not wrong. You are. (CLV) Ro 7:12 So that the law, indeed, is holy, and the precept holy and just and...

Strong is not the most accurate source available. I went with a secular Hebrew dictionary. Surely the people who speak the language every day, know it better than an American from the horse and buggy days, working from a collation of limited, and corrupted. manuscripts. What else do you have?

He didn't cite a source. I did. By default my argument is more credible. So in other words you're speculating.

I presented an expanded portion of the letter in context; and you want to prove me wrong by presenting 'out of context' snippets from other letters, even from different authors? Your counterargument is ridiculous.

I see that you failed to provide a source. What do you have to hide?

I presented my proof on page 1. You obviously reject the proof in absence of any evidence to present a credible refutation. I understand why you might feel compelled to resort to ad hominem arguments as you desperately cling to your false doctrine. את כל יִהְיֶה לְאָכְלָה כְּיֶרֶק עֵשֶׂב...

Of course not. Look at the second word in verse 8:1. 1 Nothing, consequently, is now condemnation to those in Christ Jesus. Not according to flesh are they walking, but according to spirit, 2 for the spirit's law of life in Christ Jesus frees you from the law of sin and death. This verse...

Does it matter? I said that part tongue in cheek. By the way, to my understanding Yahshua told his disciples to break Roman law when he told his disciples to buy swords.

That's not true. If it was true; then he was not without sin. If he was not without sin; then he was not who he said he was. If he was not who he said he was; then the whole NT is false doctrine. I vehemently reject your assertion. I find it to be offensive.

No he didn't.

He's talking about eating with unwashed hands against Pharisaic tradition, not a green light to go against his YHWH's law. If he did; he wouldn't pass the Deuteronomy 13 test. Deuteronomy 13 CLV(i) 1 In case there arises a prophet or a dreamer of dreams among you, and he gives to you a sign or...

He pulled that one out of Galatians; so we don't have to pour over the while letter to figure that one out. obviously he talking about the law that Yahshua lived in obedience to unto death; not Roman law.

I didn't realize that YHWH commissioned you to be the judge of that.

...and there you go. The fruit of the spirit is obedience to the law. Therefore the law won't condemn your behavior.

Nonsense. Anyone who reads Acts 15 objectively will now see this story outside of the deceptive doctrinal bias that has been placed on it. Those who seek the truth will find it, despite your smokescreen. The truth is out. Why does this rile your emotions?

I have. Have you? (CLV) Ja 2:14 What is the benefit, my brethren, if anyone should be saying he has faith, yet may have no works? That faith can not save him. (CLV) Ja 2:17 Thus, also, is faith, if it should not have works: it is dead by itself. (CLV) Ja 2:18 But someone will be declaring...