Search results

LOL! :)

It seems to me the thrust of this thread is a "social gospel' push. Or in the another mans words the 'New Evangelism'. I don't think Christians ought to be caught up in all this gossip and speculation. They have enough to be concerned about without derailing their faith. The faithful don't...

Did that hurt the brain. :) Whatever one's position on the Creation account, I firmly believe and understand it to be as stated in its literal sense. This can be supported by what I stated above-context- of the cycle of one day. Post #2 refer to Genesis 1:5 etc

You could say it sounds like it. Also, you could say "do as thou wilt" you've a 'free pass' and nothing more is required of thee. So don't concern yourself with Holiness and godliness, which are those good works God has redeemed us for. :mellow:

The following are the major differences between these two systems of theology. They represent the mainstreams of both systems, though there are variations in each. DISPENSATIONAL THEOLOGY (Lewis S. Chafer, John Walvoord, Tim LaHaye, John Nelson Darby, C.I. Scofield) COVENANT THEOLOGY (Charles...

:wacko: :blink: :rolleyes:

Dude, carbon dating is as accurate as your reasoning. Don't disappoint now. Also, one shouldn't pass as science that which is speculative philosophy. B)

Indeed he did create a mature creation(instantaneously)but he did within each day period - circulation of the Sun and Moon - whether that be Adam the animals or plants etc. Again, faith does not require us to prove or suggest a plausible argument for the unbelieving so-called intellectual...

Welcome to CB. :) I will enjoy watching what crawls out of the cracks on this subject.

And what? You ought not to be more careful in deriving doctrine from a historical account of the early church. Very little of Acts is doctrine.

AMEN, Brother. Since I was a boy of 16 the LORD made it plain it was demonic. :) If 'Trump' thinks he may persuade or convert me over to his position, he should know it would be easier to convert Satan, then try that on me. :angry: Indeed, if one sits under or submits to such teaching of...

Given that it was at the infancy of the New Covenant Church and the body of believers were being gathered into Christ, extraordinary evidence was required, until fully established and settled. But in this case they were the Baptist's disciples some 20 odd years before and therefore hadn't even...

Indeed Brother. :) The central question on which all else hangs. Get the foundation wrong all else matters not. As the scriptures state. ONE LORD ONE FAITH ONE BAPTISM. SHALOM

AMEN! :) So may it always be, brother. SHALOM

With all due respect, the Church of Christ fought such heresy earlier on and the divinity is no small matter. Remember, Paul stated through the Holy Spirit that Christ is the foundation. My friend this bloke doesn't even have one. So in your ignorance you have misplaced sympathy and have...

I did answer you. Here it is... "Answer not a fool according to their folly, lest thou be likened unto him." BUT, since you have pushed it "answer a fool according to his folly lest he be wise in his own eyes." Can you see what I see... . B)

By enduring it according to the sovereign will of God. By bearing under the yoke of Christ. By abiding in him.

How is that eavesdropping going, with the woman that maybe divorcing the partner... reckon you have another client?

Where's tolerance in the scriptures? Could you mean long suffering, patience but you didn't know where to find it. Sounds like another RCC social gospel call. B)