Search results

and there it is. I've been waiting for your true obvious character to reveal itself from our very first exchange. it's very easy to tell who's sincere on these boards and who is playing a role. take care.

go ahead and present your case with scripture and I'll happily, and very easily, show you where you're wrong. if you're implying Jesus sinned, you're in for more chagrin ... because the Bible makes clear multiple times, multiple ways that He was sinless. let's get started.

no, you weren't very clear about where exactly you stood on it. you said you didn't agree with it, but you seemed to imply you agreed that the jews were God's chosen people so that's why my post 2,266. anywho, ... THE TEN COMMANDMENTS ARE FOREVER! THEY STILL, AND ALWAYS WILL, APPLY TO TRUE...

does it make any sense to you that the people who killed Jesus were God's own people? who do you understand to be the people Jesus excoriated and publicly humiliated every day? who do you think are the people Jesus plainly stated He refused to reveal the Truth to and stated that it was NOT...

and the first physical resurrection is the ONLY physical resurrection. and takes place immediately after Christ's return and the end of the world. that's funny, that's exactly what 1 Cor. 15:23-24 declares. what a coincidence. no thousand year period on this physical earth thereafter and no...

I've heard multiple definitions for what Replacement Theology actually is. I don't believe the church (or all True Bible-believing, Holy Spirit-filled Christians) has replaced any "race" of people, I believe they are now, and always were, the True People of God all along. if the RT concept is...

oh okay. so He's God.

... the first resurrection. hmmm... that makes exactly zero sense.

no.

so your silly theory is that those who walked right beside Jesus Christ and were taught from His mouth to their ears were clueless about what He expected of them after His Crucifixion? I see you blushing about that one. it's okay, I'd be embarrassed too if I'd suggested something that...

I didn't see a list. no.

I'm with ya. I'm with ya. on the same day, yes. I'm with ya.

okay ... and these folks here who obeyed the 4th (Sabbath) Commandment after Jesus had already died on the Cross: Luke 23:54-56 how bout them? still under the Law?

that's pretty funny. so you want to claim that where it says "out of HIS Kingdom" in Matt. 13:41-42 it actually means that Jesus plucked some random ne'er-do-wells from some random kingdom He'd just acquired the deed to and punished them? that's pretty good actually. touche completely...

some just don't like to believe that the Bible has any rules in it. others just hate the word Commandment. interesting how pride goes hand-in-hand with so many who reject the Commandments.

I'm not disrespecting anybody. reproof doesn't faze me. I was simply explaining something that you and @RR144 didn't realize.

there are not two physical resurrections. I'm so glad we're friends.

thanks, I was actually aware of it. what I stated was a fact as I laid it out very clearly. 1. to "believe in" Christ is to believe He is God. 2. to not believe that Christ is God is to not "believe in" Him. 3. to be a Christian, it is clear that one must "believe in" Jesus. Christian =...

I'm too busy quoting scripture. He also said these people (jews/pharisees/scribes) teach the 10 Commandments, but don't do them. Do as they say/teach, but not as they do. Matt. 23:1-3

amazing.