Search results

False! Both the 10 commandments (which according to scripture ARE the "Mosiac law") AND what YOU call the Mosaic law are repeated in the NT. And the 10 commandments in particular are described as being "against us", since Paul describes them as something that brings "condemnation" and "death"...

I don't get this at all. You were asked to "confesseth" your sin. Rather than doing so, you lay out this verse that tells us that we SHOULD do so. So why not practice what you preach? That verse does not answer the question you were given, and I cannot see anyone on this thread does not think...

Jesus never said anything about the "entire human race". The word "man" could mean the entire human race, but it could also refer to one man, or a group of men. And since we can see from the REST of scripture that it cannot mean the enire human race (which I can prove with scripture), we can...

I didn't ask you where John mentioned ONE commandment, I asked you where he mentioned "the 10 commandments". That is central to this discussion because it involves the false argument that Christians are bound to keep the 10 commandments ... and yet ignore the rest. You have submitted verses...

After 28 pages so far I have NOT found one single SDA that can accept my challenge, nor is willing to answer my questions. I have 17 questions that I would like at least one of them address. Why can't any of you do this?

You don't even know what you are talking about. You are just throwing words around. What does "obligation" mean to you? Obviously it means that you MUST do whatever it is you are obligated to do. So what you are saying is that we are not "under the condemnation of the law" because we keep it...

Where does anything written by John mention the 10 commandments? John, through faith, became a disciple of the New Covenant. When he spoke of commandments then he spoke about what God was commanding people of THAT covenant. Otherwise, if you are not circumcised, then you had better go quickly...

No I am not! You are simply taking a part of what I say and excluding the rest in order to make it seem like you are correct. Dishonest is the word that comes to mind. If one method to keep someone from conducting themsleves immorally fails and they are given a far superior method of reaching...

Again I have to point out yet another false conclusion you are making. Not only am I saying that it is not wrong to "break" the 10 commandments (although of course it is impossible to break commandments that you are not under), I am also not saying that you are free to "disregard" them. All...

Well you are quite free to explain how you think the "distinction" you are referring to supports your theology and stands in opposition to mine. But before you do, (and while keeping in mind that you have now learnt how to use the quote boxes) please point out exactly where I have made the claim...

Please excuse me for being completely confused... Not only do most scholars give an interpretation of what a "carnal commandment" actually is referring to, you do nothing that even comes close to doing that! As I have pointed out, their claim is that the commandment to appoint priests from the...

you are doing just fine! Unfortunately the editor manages to mess things up a little, so I usually edit my posts and try to fix it, but that's not so important I guess. Well so is "difference" a synomym for distinction... just as are many other words. Synonyms, however, are not always as...

OK, I understand. I'm not really sure if the forum editor gives us a good way to quote comments in the way that I do it, but it is quite simple to achieve. The difficult thing is trying to explain it. All you need to do is copy the text you need to quote into a text editor (notepad, for example)...

I did! And I found NOTHING AT ALL that I need to apologize for... Obviously you read my posts just as sloppily as you read the Bible (if in fact you do read the Bible, rather than swallow what your teaches tell you to believe). NOWHERE in post #506 did I say that there was NO distinction at...

Of course he does! So what's your point? (...oh no... not ANOTHER strawman!) I have provided scripture that shows how the Mosaic law does not make anyone stop sinning... whereas you have provided... ??? Oh yeah.. NOTHING! I have never said that, so why are you still constructing this strawman...

I think that what "most people understand" is that Paul was referring to was all things that that the Spirit of Christ had commisioned him to do. So rather than trying to exploit a single verse to make it say whatever you want it to say, why don't you use your famous "ration and reasonal"...

Again this idiotic insinuation that I, or anyone else here, is advocating doing things that are inconsistent with the law of Christ! No one is making that argument! Now rather than referring to commandments that obviously can lead to breaking the law of Christ, why don't you point out where...

What false prophets??? Unlike you I don't base my conclusions on any denominational teaching! I am non-denominational. I don't have ANY contemprorary "prophets" whatsoever! I base my conclusions about this on scripture. For example: "We know that the law is spiritual; but I am unspiritual, sold...

I'm still waiting, after 25 pages on this topic, for ANY SDA, or Sabbatarian, to answer my questions. Why are there NONE that can do this? Why are there NONE that can even admit that they can't? It's like talking to a brick wall!

Well before I do you the service of answering your questions, dispite the fact that you refuse to answer mine, perhaps you can explain to me 1. what you mean by "allowed". 2. Where, if anywhere, I have been making the point that we are "allowed" to worship other Gods? 3. Where, if anywhere, I...