Search results

I am not in argument with the texts cited. I am not sure why you keep bringing up this point, as I am not against it, but for it. The thread is not whether the name "Jesus" is above every other name (no argument against from me), but whether the person/being Michael is another name/designation...

As you will.

You are suggesting that the names of the Son, Immanuel (Emmanuel), the Last Adam, Shiloh, David, et al, are not really the Son's names, but I quoted a commentary (or provided my own commentary) to arrive at those names for the Son?

No, I cherry picked nothing. I agreed with you, and cited the sources, showing that the pope is, as you said, the "VICAR" of Christ (which, in Latin, is Vicarius Christi, or in koine Greek, Anti-Christos). The actual substitute, that Jesus sent in His stead, was the Person/Being of the Holy...

All of that, as I said, is Jesus/Michael, that was seen. The transition is at vs. 10, from what is seen and heard to another.

Will you give me the opportunity to demonstrate my point from the scripture, and will you consider carefully what is presented, or are you set in what you presently believe? Let me know please. I will not present it, without such agreement.

Daniel saw Jesus/Michael, but Gabriel is the one speaking and the one sent by Him, as he always was in the previous chapters. If you do a comparison study of the words and language, and events, you yourself will see that it is Gabriel speaking throughout. If you would like I can present those...

As I have shown, from scripture, the Son's name is not only Jesus.

That would depend on what one believes about the name, wouldn't it? What about praying in Immanuel's name? What about praying in the last Adam's name? What about praying in Shiloh's name? etc?

I just showed you that not all "angels" are created, from scripture. What I get in return to that, is 'you' making a statement, not found in scripture. The second part is merely a statement to bolster a position which was never questioned. In other words, I never stated that God, or as you...

Not all. The word "angel" simply means 'messenger, ambassador (coming on behalf of someone else), that which carries a message (from or for another)'. The word (in English, Hebrew (mal'ak) or koine Greek (aggelos)) carries no inherent definition of nature (created or uncreated). it only...

This is incorrect. The earliest mention of Michael (the Archangel) is not from an apocryphal source (such as the so-called (pseudopigraphical) first book of Enoch, there are 3 known versions btw), but rather the earliest source, is found in Daniel 10:13,21, which was written sometime in the 3rd...

That is an incorrect statement. The idea that Michael is another designation for the Son of God (aka Jesus) was around long before the WTS/JW twisted the theology (having gone half way back unto Roman Catholicism). Melito of Sardis stated: Melito of Sardis (wrote AD 165 – AD 175, died c. AD...

... … 17. A token that the fulfillment of these hopes may soon be a reality is to be seen in the conviction and the confidence which warms the hearts of the devout. Mary will be the happy bond to draw together, with strong yet gentle constraint, all who love Christ, no matter where they may be...

““... If We have spent so large a share of our activities, in promoting the Rosary devotion, We can easily see with what benevolence the Queen of Heaven has come to Our aid when We prayed to her; and We express the confident conviction that she will continue to stand at Our side to lighten the...

Heresy #4 Mary as Mediatrix, or Redemptrix, the "Virgo Sacerdos": "O Mary, Mother of Mercy, Mother and Daughter of Him who is the Father of mercies and the God of all consolation (1), Dispensatrix of all the treasures of thy Son (2), Minister of God (3), Mother of Christ, our High Priest, thou...

Heresy #1 "Mary's function as mother of men ..." The scripturual Mary was the mother of Jesus (Matthew 1:18; John 2:1,3, 19:25; Acts 1:14), not the "mother of men". Jesus, at Calvary, entrusted the care of Mary into the hands of a believer, John, and likewise he, to her (John 19:26-27); ...

He has his own cult following, and is a non-sequitur. I debated him, on his own forum, in his own chat area, and he had to kick me and ban me permanently (we were discussing the state of the dead, which he agrees with Romanism on). I also sent him and Diane, several pages of materials on...

Exactly. Thank you. The "pope" is "VICAR" according to the Magisterium of Rome, which, stemming from the Latin, means: “Vicar (Latin vicarius, from vice, “instead of”) ...” [Online Catholic Encyclopedia, Vicar] - CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Vicar "Meaning of instead of in English instead of...

The phrase "Lord God, the Pope" is in several ed. of Extravagantes, in the gloss (a Canonist's commentary on the actual meaning of a particular phrase): http://www.biblelightinfo.com/Extravagantes.htm 1511 edition of Extravagantes viginti Johannis vigesimisecundi. Basel, Switzerland Our Lord...