Search results

No he didn't. Stop lying

John 6: 51 I am the living bread(symbolic because he is not actually bread)come down from heaven. Whoever eats this bread(still symbolic) that I will give is my flesh(not symbolic as Jesus actually has flesh) for the life of the world. The Jews hearing him understand him to mean his flesh. V52...

I don't see where you posted a scripture verse for sola scriptura. Oh that's right it's not there. I happily reject that drivel

Where did I make that claim. You people only have rote responses don't you? Cite where I made that claim.

Great faith alone is not salvific. Glad we agree

Apparently you have eyes tell me what you see here John 6:40 This is indeed the will of the father that all who see the Son and believe in him may have eternal life and I shall raise him up on the last day. John 6:54 Whoever feeds upon my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life and I will...

Not you didn't reconcile anything. They are conflicting messages by your accounting and I get what I always get when I confront these claims. So predictable. Faith is necessary but clearly NOT sufficient. Correct just like Scripture says. "Faith alone" appears only once in Scripture.

Please cite where I said works secures our salvation. Rote response don't work on me. Cite where I made that claim

Please cite where I said we are saved by works. This is what happens every time. It's too predictable

Yes by faith which is a gift of grace but not faith alone. Scripture is clear on that point and examples of instances were it was just faith do not negate the clear fact that faith alone is dead faith. Please don't start with the, how many works do you need to do silliness. It's all in...

I'm not reading into anything. You're making a choice to pay attention to certain verses which don't exactly jive with your claim it's simply belief in Jesus. I am not God and cannot create what does exist I can only observe what is. Please don't preach at me. I'm asking you to reconcile the...

So matt 7:21 and James 2:24 are lies? Or contradictions? When you add "rightly" understood that means your way not what the Bible says. On what authority do you speak infallibly about what Scripture says?

I didn't say it was there what I said was, you've determined that God couldn't have created Mary sinless. I also don't see Sola scriptura or sola fide but I hear it from "Christians" all the time. Well we could preempt them and go to Paul at 1 Corinthians 11:27-29 But i digress Irenaeus “He...

You want to be done. That's every smart of you.

And? That doesn't negate what we read in Peter. Jesus is God and he can do what he likes with his mercy but it doesn't nullify what else is taught. I'm not sure why people make this specious argument. By your telling those examples render Peters words meaningless. Nothing in Scripture is...

It has nothing to do with what I say it says, John 6:54 says what it says.

It all has Scriptural backing. Some people just disagree with the application of the text. That's not the same as saying there is no scriptural backing. So you've determined God couldn't have created Mary sinless? Fascinating. Btw the early church fathers were nothing if not Catholic

You should be honest. Tell BIL if the kids ask you questions you will tell them the truth. He doesn't decide for you what you say nor should he.

No they weren't. It's quite clear what was saying and what other people understood him to say. Cite from the text where he says his words are spiritual.

It doesn't say eternal life. THE flesh profiteth nothing yes. Are you suggesting His flesh profiteth nothing? If so then a contradiction exist. Jesus is quite specific.