Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. C

    Babylon

    Just leave it for those who can understand it. You can't. :laughing:
  2. C

    Babylon

    Evidently you can't understand plain English. Acts 2 30 Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne; 31 He seeing this before spake of the resurrection of...
  3. C

    Babylon

    Why not address Acts 2:29-35, which is Scripture's NT final word about David's throne? Acts 2 31 He seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ, that his soul was not left in hell, neither his flesh did see corruption. Does that refer to the first coming of Christ, or to the second...
  4. C

    Babylon

    Solomon sat on one throne, not two. It was identified as both the throne of David and the throne of the Lord. Yes, David's physical throne was on earth, but it was physically destroyed more than two thousand years ago. It cannot fulfill prophecy, because it does not exist. There is only one...
  5. C

    Babylon

    David's throne was on earth until Christ was resurrected and ascended to David's throne, in heaven ever since. The resurrection of Christ was not the second coming of Christ. David spoke of the resurrection of Christ. He did not speak of the second coming of Christ. Acts 2 29 Men and...
  6. C

    Babylon

    Then Solomon sat on the throne of the Lord (1Chronicles 29:23). Solomon was on earth. The Lord was in heaven.
  7. C

    Babylon

    Then sat Solomon upon the throne of David his father (1Kings 2:12). Then Solomon sat on the throne of the Lord (1Chronicles 29:23). The throne of David is the throne of the Lord. They are one and the same.
  8. C

    Babylon

    "David's throne was on earth" Acts 2 34 For David is not ascended into the heavens: but he saith himself, The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand In heaven since Christ's resurrection.
  9. C

    Babylon

    Acts 2 31 He seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ... Not of a mythical millennium.
  10. C

    Babylon

    Not according to Acts 2:29-35.
  11. C

    Indisputable proof that the Premillennial theory contradicts Scripture

    Where in Hebrews are we told that when Christ offered Himself as the Final Sacrifice, He entrusted His Offering to a Levite priest?
  12. C

    Indisputable proof that the Premillennial theory contradicts Scripture

    Since that is all in your speculative dispensational future, then obviously the rules for sacrifices are changed at that time. Don't you believe Ezekiel?
  13. C

    Indisputable proof that the Premillennial theory contradicts Scripture

    Perhaps you're unaware that reconciliation is expiation. Don't lecture me. Lecture Ezekiel. He got it wrong, right? If a prince is not normally allowed to give offerings, then you need to exhume Ezekiel and inform him of his error. :laughing: But since that is all in your speculative...
  14. C

    Indisputable proof that the Premillennial theory contradicts Scripture

    Who are the "many others", and using what Scriptures do they "make the same or similar points"? Names, sources, verbatim quotes; please.
  15. C

    Indisputable proof that the Premillennial theory contradicts Scripture

    It's the abhorrent spawn of dispen premil's vaunted and errant literal interpretation. No historic chiliast on earth (h/t @WPM), nor amil on earth in any era, would countenance such blasphemy.
  16. C

    Indisputable proof that the Premillennial theory contradicts Scripture

    These are. Ezekiel 45 15 And one lamb out of the flock, out of two hundred, out of the fat pastures of Israel; for a meat offering, and for a burnt offering, and for peace offerings, to make reconciliation for them, saith the Lord God. 17 And it shall be the prince's part to give burnt...
  17. C

    Indisputable proof that the Premillennial theory contradicts Scripture

    Were the animal sacrifices in God's OT Word eternal and unchanging?