Search results

Premil is deficient in its refusal to recognize that the New Testament is also the New Will and Testament. In God's New Will and Testament, all covenants and promises are fulfilled only in Christ, and in those who are in Christ. The OT covenants and promises are the promissory clauses of God's...

What happens to them after their mourning and bitterness?

Check post #25. Does it, or does it not, represent the "scholarly works" of Charles Ryrie et al? There are more than 1700 years of historical united NT orthodox Christian Church scholarship which refute the less than 200 years of the modernist dispensational eisegeses of Ryrie et al. If you...

Two Israels. Romans 9 6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: 7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. 8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh...

No mortal is infallible and the spirits must be tested. But validated truth should always influence our thinking. The messages of both the Commentators and Josephus include both historical and spiritual validated truth.

Ephesians 4 11 And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers; 12 For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ: So God gave some teachers, but not for you?

David's throne was destroyed by Nebuchadnezzar well over two thousand years ago. How will Christ sit on it? :laughing:

Including these promises. Galatians 3 16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ. 29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.

Was Jesus literally physically present during His literal physical first coming at His literal physical Olivet Discourse? Or was it all only virtual? :laughing:

You're too irrational to recognize your irrationality.

Paul wrote Galatians 3:16,29. He identified Abraham's descendants. So you believe that Paul was a funny racist who didn't understand what God had promised. Make sure you tell him when you exhume him. Tell us what he says. :laughing:

That bears exactly zero relationship to my post. Come back when you can talk rationally. If you can.

So you think that Paul must be confused about whom God blesses in Galatians 3:16,29. Exhume him and let him know how funny he is. Tell us what he says. :laughing:

Because that was when the conditions were met for Christ to announce the arrival of the Kingdom of God prophesied in Daniel 2:44. To God and His Son, it was very much about a secular kingdom, for it was God's chosen time, place, and conditions for the announcement.

True. And He established it during the secular kingdom of Rome. He said that the time for its fulfillment had arrived. But you've said that this is not about secular kingdoms. How do you resolve the incongruity?

This guy is a trademark cultist trying to pass himself off as an historicist. There's a continual stream of nonsense emanating therefrom. :laughing:

So He didn't establish it when Jesus announced it in Mark 1:14,15?

Why do Roman empire kings, e.g. Tiberius, not qualify as some of "these kings"?

Why would the explicit announcement of the Kingdom of God in Mark 1:14,15 not be the fulfillment of the explicit prophecy of the Kingdom of God in Daniel 2:44?

Mark 1 14 Now after that John was put in prison, Jesus came into Galilee, preaching the gospel of the kingdom of God, 15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel. Did this declaration by Jesus during Tiberius' reign mark the...