Search results

Bro, in the days of what king(s) did God set up His Kingdom as declared in Daniel 2:44?

He promised to bless Abraham, Christ, and those who are Christ's. No others.

What evidence is that? :laughing: Thanks for confirming that you're utterly incapable of identifying a single recognized Reformation historicist who corroborates your views on Daniel 2:44. Not one. You're a faux historicist. So where does that leave you? Just another cult on parade. :laughing:

Of course they did. Why did you omit this? Romans 1 1 Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, separated unto the gospel of God, 2 (Which he had promised afore by his prophets in the holy scriptures,) Now tell us why you suddenly abandoned Zechariah 13:7. :laughing:

Faux historicists pay no attention to anything. More cultic semantic ignorance. Tiberius ruled in "the days of these kings"; specifically, in the days of the kings of the Roman empire. So did the kings of the four empires, the last of which was the Roman empire, during which Christ set up the...

Here's what He promised. Galatians 3 16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ. 29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.

Just leave what you don't understand for those who do. :laughing:

Paul still used "naos" regardless of whether you believe God's Word or not.

Others as in God Himself. You've been shown previously that the 2 Thessalonians 2:4 temple is the spiritual temple of the believer in Christ, collectively His Church.

Yes, just like they planned to build the demolished one. :laughing:

Dispensational futurism is deceived by its inability to distinguish between Paul's spiritual and physical temples. There'll be no "temple Israel builds" in the future, as there was no temple when Israel tried to build in the past. Paul's temples: "naos" spiritual: 1 Corinthians 3:16 Know ye...

I'm stocked up on popcorn. Sozomen (ca. A.D.375-447) "Ecclesiastical History" Book V, Chapter XXII Though the emperor [Julian the Apostate] hated and oppressed the Christians, he manifested benevolence and humanity towards the Jews. He wrote to the Jewish patriarchs and leaders, as well as to...

You claim to be historicist, so what recognized Reformation historicists agree with your claim about the Kingdom of God? Evidence, please. Names, sources, verbatim quotes.

Obviously you don't grasp that Tiberius ruled "in the days of these kings" when Christ set up the Kingdom of God. Who does that? Not I. I see you've omitted Zechariah 13:7, so obviously you now agree that Jesus Himself exegeted that verse (Matthew 26:31; Mark 14:27), which makes no mention of...

"My doctrine". Trademark of a cult. :laughing:

Obviously you don't comprehend what "Jesus quoted" means. So just leave it for those who do. :laughing:

So then dazzle us with your unmisrepresented versions in your nonpreterist fashion. :laughing: And leave what you can't understand for those who can. :laughing:

You affirm such. The Scriptures do not. Jesus quoted Zechariah 13:7 the night of His betrayal (Matthew 26:31; Mark 14:27). He was referring to Himself (the Shepherd), and His disciples (the sheep), who would desert Him on that occasion. No mention of the Kingdom of God there except in your...

Don't you think that truth bears repetition? Since I exclusively cited Scripture, do you think that Scripture misrepresents Scripture? :laughing: If you have Scripture disproving what I've cited, then please cite yours.

Tiberius did not supplant Rome. He ruled Rome. In the days of Tiberius who ruled Rome, Christ set up His Kingdom. Mark 1 14 Now after that John was put in prison, Jesus came into Galilee, preaching the gospel of the kingdom of God, 15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God...