Search results

Again I do not know ole Georgyo so what can I say. But if he does not know about how the Comma came about there is holes in his knowledge. I am done talking about Georgyo.

You are so funny. The Comma was not in older manuscripts and they know that it came from a margin note.

I am so happy that you know that…and not only that but Christian Greek words do not have the same meanings than Koiné Greek words do nor the social religious contexts.

The Dead Sea scrolls were used mostly to verify the older manuscript. But what were they copying... Old Testament and hoping to find manusripts that were before the Septuagint. Everything is a fake....right? Except the KJV. It would be easier to argue that the world is flat.

@Bible Highlighter Look buddy. There is this thing called the internet and even AI searches (like Perplexity.ai and ChatGPT). What you did not know now, you can simply know in a few seconds. You owe to yourself to know this person because he has written multiple dictionaries in Modern Greek and...

I did not say he did not know the Greek language.....it just take a lot more than that to be a biblical scholar.

The issues with the KJV is not a matter of opinion. 1. They simply did not have the older manuscripts to work with. They show a whole lot of additions. 2. Then the desire to put things in they felt should have been there like the Latin word Lucifer in a Hebrew text. Lucifer refers to the plant...

Are you suggesting that experts in Greek language do not disagree.

The Comma is a matter of history, I do not debate history. It is like debating if the sun is hot.

I don’t know of Georgios Babiniotis and I do not think I have heard of him mentioned in college and I have been educated in five countries. There are a lot of people that know more than I do about the biblical languages. But you can read and write biblical languages and still get the meaning...

That much is obvious. Just the fact that you are defending the accuracy of the KJV proves that you do not have a grip on the biblical languages, nor are interested in the truth or even care because it is just not that hard to see the errors. And this is coming from someone that likes the KJV...

I am sure I know more about than you do.

Boy do you got that wrong.

LOL Highly insulted…..May the fleas of a thousand camels infest your crouch. I am a Tea Party Republican.

Nope you are all wrong.... Actually reading the actual scriptures would not do you any good. The reason that most accurate translates to not translate teachings to doctrine is because the word doctrine can imply more than one thing in the more modern time periods….none of which are 1st century.

LOL as in lots of laughs......the KJV strikes again! The word doctrine is not in the scriptures.

I am big on the Holy Spirit but a lot of people say the Holy Spirit teaches them but I am sure that it is one the reasons that there over 30,000 Protestant denominations.

Well the funny thing is you can read the KJB to learn the Word of God.....but if you ever get serious about it....,.you will end up learning it twice.

The best Bible?….is no Bible at all. It is best to have a working knowledge of the biblical languages and history. That will take you about a year of schooling. To read and write them that will take 3 to 4 years. No matter what translation you pick you still need to be familiar with Lexicons...

I listed the error.....argue with the facts.