Search results

I oppose the greatest hoax in human history, manmade global warming first. (COVID, a close 2nd).

Wrong. I have no such "need." Need is the language of communism. It is not a problem. Even if 100% of alarmists claims were true, I would still totally oppose what you propose we do about this "problem." Some generation of humans has to be the last one and I hope they die free.

Projecting. You cannot even acknowledge the morality that less extreme weather is better or humanity OR the set of facts I pasted in post 30.

Polling is political. @Armour of God, see how he changes from science to politics? His very first post invoked “real” climatologists. Now, he cedes the science ground to invoke polling. And even here, he fails in his Appeal to Authority. The poll that matters is elections. The electorate...

I said all life seeks to improve their situation. You deny even this.

That is where you are wrong as I’ve already stated and proven multiple times. Yours is not science but religion. You embrace the MAN IS BAD mantra at all costs.

And the watermelons will still be saying it's MAN'S FAULT. There is no guilt in striving to live in prosperity rather than poverty. The goal of all life is to improve their circumstances.

No comment on the Oregon Petition (renamed Global Warming Petition Project). 31,487 American scientists have signed this petition, including 9,029 with PhDs, reject your nonsense. And so do I. Thank God the common man can vote and not just scientists you approve!

Still not getting it. CO2 is a trace gas, negligible. Doubling it is still negligible parts per million. In understanding planetary temperature of our neighbors, you CONFESSED CO2 is not the only cause of planetary temperature. And even worse, you have cause and effect backwards. Temperature...

I have seen with my own eyes for years more moderate weather and I saw that it was good. Genesis 1:4 And God saw that the light was good. Then he separated the light from the darkness. LOL Still can't admit the moral point. Less extreme weather is good for humanity.

From an all-time low as the 400 M graph shows. GHG effects are not merely about wavelength absorption but mass. 1 gigaton of water + 1 CO2 molecule does not measurably go up in planetary temperature when 1 more CO2 molecule is added to the atmosphere. Confession. There are more causal agents...

Repeat. See OP. @Armour of God, see what I mean about being schizophrenic about how wearier not being climate? In above post, he implies equality.

Peat And repeat.

LOL You skipped over how the data shows CO2 comes after temperature change, making your religion have cause and effect backwards. CO2 is not even the most significant green house gas. It's so negligible, it has to be measured in parts per million. Mars and Venus are almost all CO2. How come...

Yea, this time of year, it tends to get warmer where I am. Warmer is my favorite. Aren't we fortunate that things are getting warmer? Much better than colder. Ice tends to make things more splippery.

Nope. See OP. LOL Every post of yours is hilarious. Exactly opposite of reality in every instance! Too funny.

My assumption?

You're so weird in flipping what I'm saying while ignoring the moral point; Less extreme weather is good for humanity. Admit it and then we can proceed to discuss it. This is how you know global warming is not science but a religion; no rejection criteria. If the weather warms or cools. If it...

Did you see his reply? Doubling down on the alarmist claim and ignoring the presented facts. Not scientific but agenda driven.

The other thing is how deviously deceptive the proponents are. There is literally a website called skeptical that reverses skeptics. The site alarmists are "skeptical" of those who are skeptical of the science. A skeptic is one who questions a positive proposition, not one who questions the...