Search results

It my opinion that the AoD was Herod getting struck with sudden words was what predicted Daniel scroll before it was altered.

I didn't know it was sarcasm.

First, I thought you believed in eternal lives in hell.

I am not an annihilationist. Hell can be temporary and God Just at the same time.

Are you serious?

You are a futurist. I am not. But I think you defend pretrib, if i am not mistaken.

I think we have been already left behind so to speak. The last days of the planet or the last day of Israel?

John said there had been many anti-Christs. I think Gamaliel was a and the false prophet.

@Trekson I think I partially agree with you. I don't think it would change my opinion of your posts.

When would be Jesus's second coming in your view?

Just one problem, you were born after the early church and after the second coming.

Does anyone know about a Theodotian version of Daniel?

But it is about seeing it act and do miracles. It was near. And everything is based obedience to laws, even if it is the law of the messiah.

I have [not] seen a manuscript that doesn't imply the same to exist. Michael Meynard believes Syrian manuscripts have it. It contradicts testimony that the Syrian doesn't have, and the Old Latin haven't been checked. It is sad because the verse is not unitarian, and many liberal unitarians were...

To apologize or say sorry?

We don't have the same interests.

Am I supposed to say it to you? Anyway, I thought admission of mistake was an enough apology.

It has been said that if you are born again, you are a child immortality. Yet, that was in Hellenic times.

Born up means either someone is persuaded by God to join the early church or someone has the holy spirit. Yes, I misread you.

I am not the one who thinks John 3:3 is about the resurrection of the dead. It isn't. You have nothing valuable to say anyway.