Search results

Yeah, many Christians in the past have been accused of heresy, take Martin Luther for one example. It's what God's Word says that's important, not what men's doctrines say. For English speaking peoples that don't know Biblical Hebrew or Greek, there have been several scholars of the past who...

The 'when' is about the day of Christ's future coming... Rev 11:14-15 14 The second woe is past; and, behold, the third woe cometh quickly. 15 And the seventh angel sounded; and there were great voices in heaven, saying, "The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of...

Paul was speaking of our spiritual body ONCE IT PUTS ON IMMORTALITY like he taught. The resurrection body of the wicked dead that are RAISED will NOT put on IMMORTALITY. Thus your doctrine, which is from man, and not from Apostle Paul, because you OMIT what Paul showed that "this mortal must...

I understand what you mean. Because I'm an old-world creationist. I interpret Genesis 1 showing there existed a previous world earth age prior to Genesis 1:2. In the Hebrew, the phrase "without form, and void" does not mean that. Instead, it means the earth had become a waste and an...

Your chart still does not work. Revelation 17 reveals the "seven heads" are "seven mountains", NOT kings. The "ten horns" represent "ten kings", and these ten kings are NOT the beast kings of past history. The historical beast kings John mentions are most likely from these past empires: 1...

Radical Islam does have its place for the end. Ezekiel 38 shows the nation alignment that will come up against both the Christian west and the nation of Israel. They are aligned with Russia. Just so happens, radical Islam today gets its training and weapons from Communist Russia and Red China...

No reason to continue with you about this, because you have the need to recognize the "resurrection of damnation" is a resurrection to the body of "incorruption" also. And that means Christ's Salvation requires that the soul put on "immortality" also. So this is NOT gibberish. It is what Apostle...

Just as much as in Genesis, so do all the Old Testament prophets cover many of those Revelation symbols. One could say the Book of Revelation is a continuation like one of the Books of the prophets. Lord Jesus was a Prophet also.

In the Daniel 2:34 verse we are shown all FIVE pieces of the beast statue being 'together'... when the "stone" (Christ, the Stone the builders rejected) comes to smite that final beast system upon its feet of part clay and part iron. That they are all 'together', points to a major revelation...

Read the Daniel 2:34-35 verses again. Then read the Daniel 2:44-45 verses. The "stone" involves the One Who will setup an everlasting kingdom in the time of those ten kings... Dan 2:44-45 44 And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be...

The Question again still is... WHEN... will the Daniel 2:34 "stone" (Christ) smite the final beast upon its feet of ten toes, and ALL... of the beast statue pieces come falling down 'together'.

Sadam did try to rebuild the city of Babylon in Iraq, but failed, for God had promised in Isaiah that the city of Babylon would never rise again. The endtime Revelation Babylon Harlot instead will be a JERUSALEM in a fallen worship state once the false-Messiah arrives in Jerusalem playing Christ.

Again No. The "seven heads" represent "seven mountains" per Revelation 17:9. There is another clue about the heads in that verse also... Those "seven mountains" represent the geographic regions of the WHOLE EARTH. It lines up with Daniel 2:34-35 for when Jesus (Stone the builders rejected)...

That's one way to look at it. The important thing though is the fact that on the day of Christ's 2nd coming that "beast" and "false prophet" Roles are destroyed, and Christ's literal physical Kingdom on earth is established instead.

No, the "seven heads" are part of the beast KINGDOM. The heads are NOT the beast-king. Jesus showed the "seven heads" are "seven mountains" per Rev.17.

And because the 'beast' and 'false prophet' go into the "lake of fire" EARLY, prior to the end of Christ's future "thousand years" reign, it means what? It means that 'beast' and 'false prophet' of Rev.16:13 are ROLES that Satan will play. Those ROLES are for this present world, at the END...

If you are relying on the KJV pronouns used in the 1st beast description to define that 1st beast that comes up out of the "sea", then you have already missed which beast those Revelation 13:1-3 are pointing to. Regardless of the pronouns there of "his" and "him" which the KJV translators used...

Those are wild assumptions, not Biblical. So here I go again... 1. Hebrews 4:12 reveals God made us with a spirit, and a soul, and flesh. Each part is a separate part. 2. Per Ecclesiastes 12:5-7, when our flesh body dies, it goes back to the earth where it came from. But our 'spirit' goes back...

Well, no, you did not, because you failed to grasp about the "resurrection of damnation", and particularly Paul's mention that his hope there will be both a resurrection of the just and the unjust, per Acts 24:15. And Lord Jesus in John 5:28-29 revealed there will be a "resurrection of...

The LORD GOD revealed to Daniel the meaning of Nebuchadnezzar's dream, and each piece of the beast statue, per Daniel 2. And like God said in Isaiah 42:9 that He tells His people of new things He does, He also revealed in that Daniel 2 dream about the FINAL beast kingdom on earth that will be...