Search results

Scripture does. That is very clear. Why will you not address what I said about 2 Peter 3:10 in comparison to 2 Peter 3:12? You try to claim those verses are not speaking about the same thing when they so clearly are. How can a reference to the day when the heavens pass away with the elements...

Haha. Yeah, I don't think there's any way to remove the unignore option, unfortunately. Maybe they should add an "Ignore Permanently" option.

Yes, I know that. I have come close to putting him on ignore for the same reason before. Right. You were not mocking his view at all. That's just a baseless, false accusation. As I'm sure you're aware, I don't take kindly to that, either. I know they do and I should cut down on that. I do that...

It becomes a matter of making that distinction when someone denies that there is such thing as angels in the sense of angels being created spirit beings who serve God, as @TribulationSigns does. At this point, I'm not even sure if you believe in the existence of angels in that sense, but I think...

The only children of the woman mentioned in Revelation 12 are Jesus (Revelation 12:5) and those who follow Jesus (Revelation 12:17). How can you think that the nation of Israel is the mother of those who follow Jesus? No, the mother of those who follow Jesus is the heavenly Jerusalem, which...

Obviously, not all Premils agree about everything just as not all Amils agree about everything, so it's understandable that you would not necessarily get along with all Premils. I'm not sure that anyone here gets along with that guy. He's always insulting everyone. Anyway, what you can do is put...

No, they do not. I showed you that 2 Peter 3:10 refers to the same things as 2 Peter 3:12 does (heavens passing away/dissolving, elements melting with fervent heat), so there is no basis whatsoever for claiming that 2 Peter 3:10 is talking about something different than 2 Peter 3:12. Peter...

You are trying to claim that the day of the Lord and the day of God are not referring to the same thing and using 2 Peter 3:10-12 as evidence for that. So, let's examine the text itself to see if that is actually indicated in the text. 2 Peter 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief...

Premillennialism is "men's false doctrine" because it contradicts a great deal of clear, straightforward scriptures. The way you butcher straightforward text like 2 Peter 3:10-12 is evidence of that. Nope. That's complete nonsense. All of Revelation 21 and 22 relates to the eternal new heavens...

It isn't that they could be fooled into thinking that a global cosmic event had already come. They weren't stupid. That would be quite obvious. What Paul was warning them about was not to believe anyone saying that the day of the Lord did not involve a global cosmic event and involved something...

Romans 1:24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: 25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. 26 For this...

Let me just stop you right there. What are "unsaved nations"? It says that the "nations" number as the sand of the sea, so it's obviously talking about individuals, not nations. The Greek word that is normally poorly translated as "nations" in that verse, which is "ethnos", can also mean...

That looks like something an immature little child would say. Is that what I said? Not at all! I'm amazed at how terrible your reading comprehension skills are in this thread. I'm not saying that none of them were ever right about anything. I'm saying they were very wrong about some things, so...

Yes, it absolutely does mean that. You know nothing about seeing the context of scripture. To deny that it's talking about the material elements is like denying that it's talking about the literal heavens and earth. But, you don't do that, do you? Nonsense. Nowhere does scripture ever speak of...

If I was you and was bent on being a preterist no matter what, I would ignore the context of 2 Thess 2 overall that is established in the first verse and not want to talk about that, either.

Yes, they are. I guess Revelation 20:15 and Revelation 21:8 are not in your Bible then because those verses refer to the same thing as Revelation 22:15. LOL. That passage is not talking about spiritually dead people. Come on. That is referring to physically dead people. It's describing the...

You can't make it as if you are quoting scripture and then change what the scripture actually says. How can you not understand that? If you're going to indicate how you understand the verse rather than actually quoting the text of the verse, then make that clear. That's not even my point! Are...

That's not an excuse for changing the text of scripture. You presented the verse as if that is how it is written in scripture. You quoted the other two verses as they are written in scripture, but not Zechariah 14:9. This kind of dishonesty is unacceptable.

No, your ridiculous comment misrepresented what I said. I did not misrepresent what you said. But, go ahead and act like a child if you insist. You should be better than that.

LOL. But, you won't take the false doctrines that many of them taught.