Search results

In regards to @Douggg view it wouldn't be. He does not agree that the feasting birds event in Ezekiel 39 is meaning the feasting birds event in Revelation 19. Therefore, 2 feasting birds events rather than 1. One 7 years earlier, another one 7 years later. But if they are the same event, and...

When Christ returns, will or will there not still be mass weapons of war that mankind still possesses? Such as tanks, missiles, bomber jets, nuclear weapons? Where in the NT that you see referring to this 7 years in question, that you see a hint of anyone burning weapons of war for 7 years...

Forget what I said earlier about it proving Amil in that case. I have a better argument. The following kills 2 birds with one stone. It proves that nothing in Ezekiel 38-39 can be meaning during satan's little season. Plus it clearly debunks Amil since they have no place to fit the following...

If anything in Ezekiel 38-39 is post mil, it proves Amil in that case, not Premil. I can provide some reasons why. But later not at this moment.

First of all you don't know whether angels have bodies or not since they exist in an unseen realm. Maybe they do, maybe they don't. I'm not arguing they do, nor am I arguing they don't. I simply don't know. But that is not the point in regard to being compared to angels. The comparison is...

What exactly are you hoping to prove with this passage? This is the context-- But about the resurrection of the dead. Thus explains why He is not the God of the dead, but the God of the living, in regards to these 3 patriarchs mentioned. But that doesn't mean these are soul sleeping. A...

Why is it that only those passages count but the following don't? 1 Corinthians 15:51 Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed, 52 In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised...

Be reasonable here. Quit trying to make the text agree with you when you aren't even making an effort to agree with the text. Nowhere in Revelation 19 is the time of the cross and resurrection in view. What's in view is the end of the little season meant in REvelation 6 and His 2nd coming. It is...

Amil, but maybe not all Amils, need the entire planet to be engulfed in flames per the 2nd coming in order for there to be no habitable earth for Christ to return to with His kingdom He brings with Him. Therefore, in their mind, Premil is impossible based on that alone, since there is no...

Obviously, in Revelation 19 it is a continuation of what just occurred in ch 18. Where do you see anyone being cast out of heaven in ch 18? Revelation 18:18 And cried when they saw the smoke of her burning, saying, What city is like unto this great city! 19 And they cast dust on their heads...

If only it was that simple. Except it isn't when some of these passages in question come across as nonsensical if they are not involving an era of time after Christ has returned, but are not involving all of eternity. Therefore, an era of time after Christ returns, an era of time that has a...

That was very insightful. Speaking for myself, I never realized any of that. But now I do. Thanks.

That's not the question. The question is, is Christ reigning now and will He still be reigning in the same manner, except bodily, when He returns? The answer to both questions is yes. But Amil only wants Him reigning now in an unseen manner and apparently do not see Him having the ability to...

It might be different if Amil had a solution for a number of passages that are meaning post the 2nd coming, yet require more than a single day to fulfill, but is not involving all of eternity.

But look what Jesus said, though. Matthew 24:7 For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places. 8 All these are the beginning of sorrows. nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither...

So why are some of these Amils purposely misrepresenting Premil by claiming deception is rampant throughout Premil's proposed millennium? Especially when some of these Amils were Premil before they became Amil?

You have a right to your opinion. No one is obligated to agree with it, though.

But if he is already bound according to you, it seems absurd to have to bind him yet again. I'm not saying your experience was not real. I believe you 100%. I'm saying it makes zero sense to bind someone that is already bound. Therefore, satan is not already bound, otherwise you would not have...

Though, I see your point, and it is an interesting point at that, that is still not the same as He Himself being bodily upon the earth and that everyone can see He is bodily present the same way everyone could see He was bodily present when He walked the earth 2k years ago, for example. You...

The only way Amil survives is if only OSAS is Biblical, NOSAS isn't. Which would then mean everyone overcomes, regardless. Which then makes nonsense out of why does one need to overcome in order to be rewarded, if being saved alone automatically means having overcome, period? Some Amils of...