Search results

Wasn't the Gnostics.

I never implied otherwise.

Like Dislike Earliest Manuscript Evidence for Mark 16:9–20 The earliest complete Greek manuscripts of the Gospel of Mark that include Mark 16:9–20 date to the 5th century. The two oldest and most important manuscripts that omit the passage are Codex Sinaiticus (c. 330–360) and Codex Vaticanus...

Your extreme ignorance is astounding. Your arrogance in promoting your ignorance is even more so. The gnostics did not write any biblical manuscripts. they wrote their own . Did the Gnostics Write Their Own Biblical Manuscripts? Yes — the Gnostics did produce their own religious...

I hope you do not have a career in mind reading. You are so very terrible at it. I know the biblical finish god has appointed. No I do not go according to my own understanding as you do. Once again any "revelation" you p[ropose that contradicts the plain inspired Word of God is demonic.

YOu are such an uneducated waif! You vomit out foolish statments that are untrue! You make claims then slink away when asked for proof. No Translation is word for word exact. That is impossible. I will give one example: Heb 10:14 For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that...

And without presenting evidence all you are doing is blowing verbal methane. I am incline3d to believe you have no support for your claims.

This is a bold face lie. The dead sea scrolls only have Isaiah and four other OT books. No NT books. And as the other thread is closed- Erasmus used only 5 manuscripts. that was found on google within 4 seconds. But given yopur propensity to cite other horrendous sources for your "facts"...

See you scream at teh NIV people, but are more guilty of faulty hermeneutics than they are! The earliest manuscripts do not have them, much of teh works of the ante-nicene church fathers do not wriote of these verses, but you say they were there in the originals. What is your proof?

And you have evidence to back up your belief they were gnostic? The gnostics would not have copied the Scriptures as they were a very heretical group of people.

Except that the eternal covenants Gd made with the nation of Israel are still in effect. that doesn't mean all are saved by ethnicity, but that God will honor HIs covenants.

Well I will allow the Lord to judge me and not you! And how many of your beliefs are based on your own understanding? I trust the Lord guides my understanding of His Word. He created grammar as the tool to communicate, so I trust He uses it in the manner He taught us how to use it. I do...

Yes I know and argue the very same thing! Wjhy are y9ou writing this to me. I do not disagree.

I don't take it upon myself. I take any "new revelation" and compare it with the NT. If it disagrees with the NT, it is not of God! I do not care how sincere, or religious or pious the person may be. The NT is our final authority! If a vision is different or says different than what God...

The uncials are what we have! And if you wish to make cliams, please support them and not just vomit them out without some empirical evidence. I could say that the mss were written by men from mars as well!

So that means there is no Israel. No French. We are all androgynous? No females or males anymore? You are not understanding at all what that verse is saying. Of course there is bond and free, in christ there are males and females! Even Paul said there are Jews and Gentiles that make one body.

From history, writing styles and other clues you can look up as quickly as I can.

Show it from Scripture! And please do not take verses out of their immediate contexst.

No it does not make for a false God or doctrine. As the Inspired Apostle said: 2 Timothy 3:16-17 King James Version 16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 17 That the man of God may be...

1. there is no proof that newer manuscripts are more accurate. 2. It is not arbitrary. All verses that appear in MSS should be included 3. Now you are being foolish. it si not arbitrary . If a word does not appear, it wwas not written 4. That is totally incorrect. 5. Name 10 of these...