Search results

You will do well to Google "Sunday Blue Laws"

HUH??? What is the relevance between what I posted, and what you posted? I never mentioned "Armageddon and Gog and Magog " so why do you bring it up? How do you pretend to know what a "new heaven and new Earth" will look like? I ask because your post assumes that you do know that, and yours is...

Thank you, but in sincerity, I ask the application of that to the heresy of annihilation because it says nothing about the souls that are dead at the second coming, unless you read much into that.

Revelation 20: 9 And they marched up over the broad plain of the earth and surrounded the camp of the saints and the beloved city, but fire came down from heaven and consumed them, 10 and the devil who had deceived them was thrown into the lake of fire and sulfur where the beast and the false...

Paul the Apostle disagrees with your home-spun theology: 2 Corinthians 15: 12 Now if Christ is proclaimed as raised from the dead, how can some of you say that there is no resurrection of the dead? 13 But if there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised. 14 And if...

. It is interesting how you will make reference to the Greek pantheon, and especially of the god Narcissus, but you have not made ANY direct reference to the Bible in its context.

You STILL do not get it. You made up those cockamamie phrases, and it is YOUR burden of proof, NOT mine to define them. I will admit that you are adept is your efforts to switch the burden of proof, and telling me to go back of 9 years of your posts here. However, I will not do that because you...

It is interesting how you will make reference to the Greek pantheon, and especially of the god Narcissus, but you have not made reference to the Bible.

Do you have a licence to practice "pop psychology"? The forum is supposed to be against discussing other posters, but you just flaunted it. I admit that my question above stays on the safe side of being rude, but it is a startling question, designed for you to see how much more rude your "pop...

Sorry, but it does not work that way. In post 22 you stated: Therefore, it is YOUR JOB not mine to define it. You are asking me to "define the opposite of limited grace" . I also prefer that you give a Bible-based definition. Anecdotal comments have no authority such as we find in the Bible...

I described your POSTS, Barney. I did not call you names as you just did to me in your last post: I made a reasonable assumption about your theology, (NOT YOUR PERSON) based upon your posts.. Are perhaps COJCLDS?

You are not a post. I merely made an observation on the inaccuracy of the polling post because it (not a poster) left our other possibilities. Additionally, I suggest that you (and others) apply the correct definition of the term; it means "to the man", to whatever I may post, and you will...

It is a form of dishonesty to take a snippet of a sentence and make it appear as if I stated a different thought than what I ACTUALLY posted PAY ATTENTION TO THE ACTUAL WORDS: On other forums, I am NEVER accused of doing that, therefore I demand you provide an example. If you are unable to do...

To quote the philosopher Shania Twain: THAT DON'T IMPRESS ME MUCH! That is hilarious! You and your buddies start the personal attacks, so now you put me on ignore because I expose your multiple failures of rising to the level of a rational, Scripture-based discussion. NONE of your buddies can...

EXACTLY! There are ZERO of you posters wanting to discuss things on that level You are not "correctly remembering". You took as a personal affront my effort to seek clarification, and to use Scripture for support. Your issue, not mine So I am supposed to accept all the insults you and...

Do you remember this, from a previous post of yours? YOU are the one who first brought up the claim, therefore it is up to you to define it, and hopefully so by the use of Scripture in context Not so. You introduced it, therefore you define it. What is preposterous is that you are asking me...

Are you then proposing a limited grace? If that is the case, what are the limits of that grace, and since you are using theological terms, please back that up with Scripture in context. How do you make that connection? There are two different realms, and one does not the other to a great extent.

Because I have so many ad hominems hurled at me like barn floor scrapings thrown into a fan, I think that that rule is selectively and unevenly enforced. Good post, though.

That is quite the prideful and irrational statement! You know ZERO about what I believe, excepting what I posted previously, but your imperious smugness is able to disprove it. As a matter of record: There are NONE of y'all who have attempted to discuss any theology or what the Scripture says...

Yall who have thrown out so many ad hominems shall not presume to lecture me on what Scripture says in its context. God wrote the Bible, He says what he meant, and He means what he wrote. Neither you nor I get to make a vote on the content of the Bible. Sorry if y'all do not like that. There...