Search results

Huh? Are you suggesting that Lazarus never died again? The chief priests wanted to kill him, and you have him at the crucifixion site in your fantasy. "Much people of the Jews therefore knew that he was there: and they came not for Jesus' sake only, but that they might see Lazarus also, whom...

Keep repeating that fantasy to yourself. Here is who was at the Last Supper with Jesus: "Now when the even was come, he sat down with the twelve." (Mat. 26:20) "And in the evening he cometh with the twelve." (Mark 14:17) "And when the hour was come, he sat down, and the twelve apostles with...

Jesus promised no such thing, so you are the liar, and not me. This is what Jesus actually said: "For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works. Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall...

Blah. blah, blah. Where is your proof that Lazarus was at the Last Supper? Psst. None exists BECAUSE HE WAS NOT THERE.

No, I didn't. I mean, why would I notice something that the Bible does not say. You have conveniently added the word "same" while altering the meaning of the text. Here. Try these on for size: New International Version and to the disciple, “Here is your mother.” From that time on, this...

"And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment: So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation." (Heb. 9:27-28) Jesus will appear bodily THE SECOND TIME without sin unto...

I researched that ridiculous notion thoroughly many years ago, and I found it to be patently false.

True, but nobody budged from Jerusalem until the time of great persecution against the church at Jerusalem. "And Saul was consenting unto his death. And at that time there was a great persecution against the church which was at Jerusalem; and they were all scattered abroad throughout the...

Rather than waste any more precious time with someone who deliberately conflates “the prince of Tyrus” (Ezek. 28:2) and “the king of Tyrus” (Ezek. 28:12), I will just quickly point out some things about “the king of Tyrus” myself. We read: Ezekiel chapter 28 [11] Moreover the word of the LORD...

While I have a moment, let me quickly point out a biblical principle that is directly related to the topic at hand. There are times in scripture when God not only addresses a man, but he also addresses the Spirit or spirit behind the man that is inspiring him. For example, we read: Matthew...

Not at all. Again, I asked you about "the king of Tyrus" (vs. 12), and you deliberately keep on addressing "the prince of Tyrus" (vs. 2) because you cannot answer my actual question without refuting your own erroneous position. Nope. Again, that was written about "the prince of Tyrus," so stop...

The laugh is on you. Here is the complete verse that you deliberately truncated: "Son of man, say unto the prince of Tyrus, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Because thine heart is lifted up, and thou hast said, I am a God, I sit in the seat of God, in the midst of the seas; yet thou art a man, and not...

Anybody else?

Exactly the type of evasive non-answer I expected. I made a comment on THIS THREAD. You responded to my comment on THIS THREAD. If you think that you can prove that "the king of Tyrus" is a man, then do it on THIS THREAD. Just cut and paste your error here, and then I will refute it. If not...

Make your case here, and then I will refute it.

Ezekiel 28:12-19 would be a good place to start. Oh, I know that you think you know what those verses are about (I took a peek at your thread on it), but you don't. Let's start here: Is "the king of Tyrus" (Ezekiel 28:12) a man or an angelic being? If you believe that it is a man, then make...

Says you.

There was ample time for Satan's fall between Genesis 1:31 and Genesis 3:1, so you have not proven what you mistakenly think you have.

The short answer is free will.