Search results

Please focus. This is the question: Do you want to communicate with these people about Jesus? This is the 2nd time I have asked.

The Almighty God allowed Eve to be tempted by the serpent. As a result, Adam and Eve fell. This World Is a Testing Ground for Everyone. In the ultimate, first-cause sense, God caused suffering. True. Many years later, God sent a flood to kill everyone on earth except Noah's family, causing many...

Do you want to communicate with these people about Jesus?

Thanks for the references. To save the effort of your readers, this is how to do referencing in a scholarly manner: Give the source/citation. Provide the URL link to the source if available. Indent the quoted text. Bold the relevant keywords that are important to the point that you are making...

reference?

verse?

In the last 2 millenniums, there was never a time when it was the only possible view among all churches. See Origen was a Universalist.

So right. I visited a few of them. I actually did it on purpose to see what they were like. Point take. I'll change the wording. Thanks :) No worries, I just put them on ignore when I think that further communication would not be helpful to them. I do 3 attempts :)

Matthew 10: Only God is immortal. Believers possess immortality because they have the Paraclete. Non-believers do not have the Paraclete. They are not immortal, 1 Corinthians 15:

Right. Now, for the sake of communication with the other person, can you choose to empathize, i.e., putting yourself in their shoes, seeing things from their perspective, and understanding their emotions? This is the 2nd time I have asked this question.

Sure I can. Thank you for asking. Now I ask you: Can you imagine putting yourself in a trans person's shoes like a mature and objective human being?

For the sake of communication with the other person, can you empathize, i.e., putting yourself in their shoes, seeing things from their perspective, and understanding their emotions?

Lady Ballers (2023) takes a comical approach to this issue. It's pretty funny :)

That's the best honest answer :)

Do you think people like Taken will eventually take up this new evolved vocabulary?

Right. I think it is a sign of the time. It may indicate the decline of the Western civilization, which has ruled the world for the last centuries.

Right. I am just a little surprised that an openly unempathetic person like Taken could be a staff member of this Christian platform.

Right, it is easier to communicate when all parties already have identical definitions. Nevertheless, you need agreed definitions for different parties to communicate. Otherwise, miscommunication ensues.

Can you imagine putting yourself in another person's shoes like a mature and objective human being? This is the 2nd time I have asked. Please focus on my question instead of sidestepping as your usual habit.

In terms of the formal process of argumentation, I can assume their definition without believing it. I do it for the sake of efficient communication.