Search results

No, I'm correct and stated the case to refute your beliefs plainly with applicable references (specifically in #216) Since then, you have done nothing but waffle, talk with circular rhetoric saying nothing and repeat the same false points over and over. What you have failed to do is either...

What that means in non- double talk is that you realize you are wrong and cannot refute it so you are now hiding behind obfuscating words and arguing in circles now. Textbook signature of a weak and refuted premise.

You have yet to show the error in any legitimate read of scripture nor have you invalidated the scripture that directly contradicts your claims

How does that apply to anything being discussed here?

You are free to "believe" that they are from the government and are actually here to help if you want to but when you make the claim that its actual scripture then the requirement to validate that "belief" from the source attaches and you keep not doing it. You have yet to actually do that or...

The statement is correct. No "church" (as an organization) has any authority from God at all. And from experience, in many (not all) cases, the larger they get- the worse they become. That's a personal observation which is not a point of debate nor am I saying its a global "truth". No, that's...

Regardless of what cult may adopt them, they are true regardless

All cute but none either addressed or refuted the specific points and again, you are misapplying them out of context.

Then explain Matthew 10:28 SPECIFICALLY pointing out the following and how your 'belief' negates it Body- Somah (G4983) physical flesh whole body Soul- psookay (G5590) breath, spirit, vitality, immortal soul Destroy- apolomeh (G622) perish, die, absolute full destruction Hell- ghenna (G1067)...

Another error on your part. I am neither of those and refute them frequently. That aside doesn't add any credibility to your position

No Abby,you even admit you have no detailed knowledge to discuss the point on so how do you know your position is in fact accurate? You are arguing an "English" word which in itself is an "approximate" to the actual Greek with no understanding of context and other linking scriptures.

No, MANY actually are very well versed and know the subject because we study and learn- not sitting idly by hiding behind excuses for not studying and learning.

All very nice and true but when properly read and contexted invalidate your entire premise. Again, eternal punishment (completed act)- not eternal punishING. Same with contempt.

what scripture says that in those words? In English, "immortal" means "not" (prefix im) mortal as in the properties of mortality. It does not default to eternal existence. We do not have 'eternal life" ( in the biblical sense) until we are regenerated thru Christ. Not all "souls" get to that.

You yourself say you don't know, don't listen, don't learn and you have no ability to discuss intelligently ( those are your own claims from the post above) on any point so how would you know what any of it means?

You talk in circles but ignore all scripture that refutes your claim. In the Garden after Adam "became' a living soul- It was pointed out that he was removed lest he eat the "tree of life" and live forever. You refuse to accept the actual definition of death and what scripture says about the...

No, that is simply incorrect

No, that is not true. Not even with Adam.

If only people could grasp that

that is false, no legitimate read of scripture supports your claim of a second chance or universal salvation. (man is appointed to die once then face judgement) You claim ( above) this is what scripture says- where exactly is the scripture(s) that say this? It has been tested and its false...